These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1011005)

  • 21. Modality differences in recognition memory for words and their attributes.
    Kirsner K
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 Apr; 102(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 4824300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Verbal asymmetries and levels of processing in an interactive dual-task paradigm.
    Adams BJ; Duda PD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Apr; 60(2):371-83. PubMed ID: 4000849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cognitive effort and the word frequency effect in recognition and lexical decision.
    Mutter SA; Hashtroudi S
    Am J Psychol; 1987; 100(1):93-116. PubMed ID: 3592027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Got rhythm…for better and for worse. Cross-modal effects of auditory rhythm on visual word recognition.
    Brochard R; Tassin M; Zagar D
    Cognition; 2013 May; 127(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 23454794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A systematic investigation of the functional neuroanatomy of auditory and visual phonological processing.
    Burton MW; Locasto PC; Krebs-Noble D; Gullapalli RP
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):647-61. PubMed ID: 15955475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition.
    Becker CA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 May; 5(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 528937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.
    Gosselin PA; Gagné JP
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 21916790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stimulus intensity and foreperiod effects in intersensory facilitation.
    Bernstein IH; Chu PK; Briggs P; Schurman DL
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1973 May; 25(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 4515814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.
    Sugimoto F; Katayama J
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():55-62. PubMed ID: 28377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of task-irrelevant high-speed verbal stimulation on a visual/verbal word-discrimination task: an event-related potential study.
    Uemura J; Hoshiyama M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Dec; 121(12):2065-9. PubMed ID: 20566301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Latency of modality-specific reactivation of auditory and visual information during episodic memory retrieval.
    Ueno D; Masumoto K; Sutani K; Iwaki S
    Neuroreport; 2015 Apr; 26(6):303-8. PubMed ID: 25756907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Divided attention disrupts perceptual encoding during speech recognition.
    Mattys SL; Palmer SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1464-72. PubMed ID: 25786957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interference between postural control and spatial vs. non-spatial auditory reaction time tasks in older adults.
    Fuhrman SI; Redfern MS; Jennings JR; Furman JM
    J Vestib Res; 2015; 25(2):47-55. PubMed ID: 26410669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dissociating central and auditory attention: Is there a shared bottleneck for response selection and auditory search?
    Kattner F; Reimer CB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Oct; 73(10):1564-1574. PubMed ID: 32419615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The functional neuroanatomy of multitasking: combining dual tasking with a short term memory task.
    Deprez S; Vandenbulcke M; Peeters R; Emsell L; Amant F; Sunaert S
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Sep; 51(11):2251-60. PubMed ID: 23938320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Making things difficult in lexical decision: the impact of pseudohomophones and transposed-letter nonwords on frequency and semantic priming effects.
    Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1267-89. PubMed ID: 20804296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Brain activity during auditory and visual phonological, spatial and simple discrimination tasks.
    Salo E; Rinne T; Salonen O; Alho K
    Brain Res; 2013 Feb; 1496():55-69. PubMed ID: 23261663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attentional capture by spoken language: effects on netballers' visual task performance.
    Bishop DT; Moore S; Horne S; Teszka R
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(17):1611-20. PubMed ID: 24734776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.