These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10110086)

  • 1. Employers might lose a popular cost-cutter.
    Med Econ; 1991 Apr; 68(8):17. PubMed ID: 10110086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Data watch. A sample of cost-cutting strategies.
    Bus Health; 1993 Sep; 11(10):16-7. PubMed ID: 10128296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More companies let 'experts' second-guess doctors' claims.
    Med Econ; 1994 May; 71(10):11. PubMed ID: 10133945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utilization review: the art of polite interference.
    Jones S; Bailey NC
    Bus Health; 1991 Feb; 9(2):30-2, 36, 41-3. PubMed ID: 10109752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using encounter data from Medicaid HMOs for research and monitoring.
    Sing M
    Inquiry; 2004; 41(3):336-46; discussion 347. PubMed ID: 15669750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Focused psychiatric review: impacts on expense and utilization.
    Gotowka TD; Smith RB
    Benefits Q; 1991; 7(4):73-81. PubMed ID: 10170927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A survey of human resources in managed care organizations.
    Kelley SK; Trautlein JJ
    Physician Exec; 1992; 18(6):49-51. PubMed ID: 10122614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. UR: from cost cutting to managing care.
    Bus Health; 1993 Sep; 11(10):41-4. PubMed ID: 10128300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use your own data to establish cost, utilization benchmarks.
    Capitation Rates Data; 2000 Aug; 5(8):87-9. PubMed ID: 11186736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Group health benefits fraud: who's winning a lose-lose game?
    Carlsen MA
    Benefits Q; 1992; 8(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 10120250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Employers balk at provider-backed efforts to limit reach of utilization-review firms.
    Kenkel PJ
    Mod Healthc; 1991 Oct; 21(41):30. PubMed ID: 10114204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Web site survey comments.
    Schlosser A
    Health Data Manag; 1998 Nov; 6(11):104. PubMed ID: 10185890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stats & facts. The appeals process: what have we learned?
    Manag Care Interface; 1999 Mar; 12(3):54-5. PubMed ID: 10351408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. By the numbers. Early evidence shows independent review working for consumers.
    Healthplan; 2000; 41(2):71-2. PubMed ID: 10977691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of an outpatient utilization review program.
    Lawless GD
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 Dec; 60(12):23-7. PubMed ID: 10296533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Data watch. Tackling claims administration expenses.
    Bus Health; 1992 Apr; 10(5):18-9. PubMed ID: 10117927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. HMOs and employers unite to collect outcomes data.
    Jordahl G
    Bus Health; 1992 Jun; 10(7):44-50. PubMed ID: 10119131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. UR accreditation raises questions among employers.
    Wise D
    Bus Health; 1993 Jan; 11(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 10125563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marketing utilization review services.
    DeMarco WJ; Fox BB
    Health Care Strateg Manage; 1989 Apr; 7(4):13-5. PubMed ID: 10292792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is utilization review paying off?
    Vibbert S
    Bus Health; 1989 Feb; 7(2):20-6. PubMed ID: 10293557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.