These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10110252)
1. Managing in Maryland. Maryland's all-payer rate-control system enjoys the support of providers, payers and legislators as well as the public. Merson MR Health Manage Q; 1991; 13(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 10110252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Setting hospital rates to control costs and boost quality: the Maryland experience. Murray R Health Aff (Millwood); 2009; 28(5):1395-405. PubMed ID: 19738257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of hospital performance under the partial-payer Medicare PPS and state all-payer rate-setting systems. Rosko MD Inquiry; 1989; 26(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 2523344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Study says state all-payer systems successful. Uhlar B Hospitals; 1987 Nov; 61(21):39. PubMed ID: 3311964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of alternative hospital payment systems on Medicaid costs. Holahan J Inquiry; 1988; 25(4):517-32. PubMed ID: 2976052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of the New Jersey all-payer rate-setting system: an analysis of financial ratios. Rosko MD Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1989; 34(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 10291809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Economic prelude to prospective reimbursement by DRGs. Lairson DR J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1985; 8(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 10311515 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Hospital cost inflation under state rate-setting programs. Biles B; Schramm CJ; Atkinson JG N Engl J Med; 1980 Sep; 303(12):664-8. PubMed ID: 7190645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perspectives. Maryland reform seeks cost containment. Anderson JM Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1993 Jun; 47(26):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10126520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of ambulatory patient groups for regulation of hospital ambulatory surgery revenue in Maryland. Atkinson G; Murray R J Ambul Care Manage; 2008; 31(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 18162791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rating the rate-setting states. Cost Containment; 1980 Oct; 2(19):3-6. PubMed ID: 10273226 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Hospital rate regulation and market incentives: contemporary approaches to cost containment. Rosko MD J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1986; 8(4):320-38. PubMed ID: 10277655 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Hospital controls save $3.1 billion. Sperling D Bus Insur; 1980 Nov; 14(44):1, 40. PubMed ID: 10273225 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Merging HMOs into an all-payer system: a model to pursue? Weil TP J Health Care Finance; 1998; 24(2):56-64. PubMed ID: 9395963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective reimbursement in Maryland. Worthington NL; Tyson K; Chin M Top Health Care Financ; 1979; 6(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 573514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Rate setting and hospital cost-containment: all-payer versus partial-payer approaches. Zuckerman S Health Serv Res; 1987 Aug; 22(3):307-26. PubMed ID: 3316123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. HHS offers plan for controlling hospital costs...prospective payment. Prout DM Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1983 Feb; 3(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 10273364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]