These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10110333)

  • 1. Perspectives. The U.S. contraceptive gap.
    Munnings F
    Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1991 May; 45(19):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10110333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A national voice for women's health concerns.
    Norinsky M
    Health PAC Bull; 1979; 11(2):21-2. PubMed ID: 10247064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NIH aims at 'glass ceiling'.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Mar; 356(6364):6. PubMed ID: 1538781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perspectives. Fetal tissue ban: politicizing science?
    Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1990 May; 44(21):suppl 2 p.. PubMed ID: 10104781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gender discrimination in the medical community.
    Scott AK
    Update; 1995 Jul; 11(2):E1. PubMed ID: 16130241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gender gap in research hit by ANA.
    Pa Nurse; 1991 Aug; 46(8):24. PubMed ID: 1876412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trends that will affect your future ... a different kind of woman.
    Schwartz SA
    Explore (NY); 2006 May; 2(3):198-9. PubMed ID: 16781641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.".
    Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A woman's right to choose: designation of fetal tissue donees.
    Fazio TJ
    Hofstra Law Rev; 2001; 30(2):533-55. PubMed ID: 12666683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Boost for women's health.
    Aldhous P
    Nature; 1991 Jul; 352(6332):180. PubMed ID: 1857402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
    Weitz TA; Yanow S
    Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perspectives. What women want in medical research.
    Wiener JO
    Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1990 Sep; 44(37):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10107003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perspectives. Abortion after Webster.
    Olson EG
    Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1989 Jul; 43(28):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10294036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The disfranchisement of fertile women in clinical trials: the legal ramifications of and solutions for rectifying the knowledge gap.
    Bowles LE
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1992 May; 45(4):877-920. PubMed ID: 16047448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Women's health research at the NIH.
    Pinn VW
    J Gend Specif Med; 2000 Apr; 3(3):26-7. PubMed ID: 11252823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion rights needed.
    Keller BR
    Tex Med; 2000 Jun; 96(6):10-1. PubMed ID: 10876366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A search for limits.
    Woodward KL
    Newsweek; 1993 Feb; 121(8):52-3. PubMed ID: 11645224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Women in science.
    Hogan B
    Nature; 1992 Nov; 360(6401):204. PubMed ID: 1436103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ensuring equal medicine: a view from one woman in congress.
    Slaughter LM
    Internist; 1994 Feb; 35(2):11-3, 17. PubMed ID: 10132086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is there life after Roe? How to think about the fetus.
    Kissling F
    Conscience; 2004-2005 Winter; 25(3):10-8. PubMed ID: 16538752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.