These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10110606)

  • 21. Rust v. Sullivan, and the future of abortion under a more conservative Supreme Court.
    Browning DA
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1991 Sep; 80(9):499-501. PubMed ID: 1744530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sterilizations and abortions--federal financial participation: final rules.
    Fed Regist; 1978 Nov; 43(217):52145-75. PubMed ID: 10297259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Title X family planning subsidies: the government's role in moral issues.
    Reitler EG
    Harvard J Legis; 1990; 27(2):453-95. PubMed ID: 11656070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Why the government is not required to subsidize abortion counseling and referral.
    Hirt TC
    Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun; 101():1895-915. PubMed ID: 11655923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. State vs. feds. Missouri becomes battleground over funding for family-planning programs.
    Galloro V
    Mod Healthc; 2001 Jul; 31(31):20-1. PubMed ID: 11508138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rust v. Sullivan: a better debate.
    America (NY); 1991 Jun; 164(22):611. PubMed ID: 15991418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evolving State-Based Contraceptive and Abortion Policies.
    Mallampati D; Simon MA; Janiak E
    JAMA; 2017 Jun; 317(24):2481-2482. PubMed ID: 28558101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Title X program faces major upheaval as High Court okays ban on abortion speech.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 May; (9):1-4. PubMed ID: 12343265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. U.S. Supreme Court considers new Title X regulations.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1991; 23(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 2029942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The "gag rule" revisited: physicians as abortion gatekeepers.
    Bloche MG
    Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 11651561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Why the government is not required to subsidize abortion counseling and referral.
    Hirt TC
    Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun; 101(8):1895-915. PubMed ID: 10288539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The 'gag rule'.
    Dubberke L
    Am Fam Physician; 1992 Jun; 45(6):2481. PubMed ID: 1510781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Toward a First Amendment theory of doctor-patient discourse and the right to receive unbiased medical advice.
    Berg P
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1994 Mar; 74(2):201-66. PubMed ID: 11659979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ruling could obligate hospitals to millions more in indigent care.
    Berg E
    Mod Healthc; 1991 Aug; 21(34):10. PubMed ID: 10112394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. H.L. v. Matheson and the right of minors to seek abortions.
    Wolff MH; Hawn RH
    Calif West Law Rev; 1982; 19(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Supreme Court ruling on family planning violates free speech, professional ethics.
    Carlson K
    Pa Nurse; 1991 Aug; 46(8):24. PubMed ID: 1876413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Romney lays down pro-life credentials with vow to ban most abortions.
    Tanne JH
    BMJ; 2012 Jul; 345():e5211. PubMed ID: 22851601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Abortion in 1938 and today: plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose.
    Bourne RW
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2003; 12(2):225-75. PubMed ID: 16493843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Federal financial participation in state claims for abortions.
    Fed Regist; 1978 Feb; 43(23):4571-82. PubMed ID: 10236701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. U.S.: Obama lifts ban on funding for international groups performing or counselling abortions.
    HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev; 2009 May; 14(1):33, 35. PubMed ID: 19610210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.