These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10111508)

  • 21. Services, policies and costs in U.S. abortion facilities.
    Lindheim BL
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1979 Oct; 11(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 520508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A future for Title X?
    Richards C
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1991; 23(5):228-9. PubMed ID: 1743277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Financial effect of instituting Deficit Reduction Act documentation requirements in family planning clinics in Oregon.
    Rodriguez MI; Angus L; Elman E; Darney PD; Caughey AB
    Contraception; 2011 Jun; 83(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 21570551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Questions and answers on HEW abortion regulations.
    Sellers B; Langston L
    Gov Relat Note; 1978 Feb; 4(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 10297094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare--abortions: final regulation.
    Fed Regist; 1979 Oct; 44(209):61597-8. PubMed ID: 10297597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rust v. Sullivan: a better debate.
    America (NY); 1991 Jun; 164(22):611. PubMed ID: 15991418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bound and gagged: America's family planning network.
    Dryfoos JG
    J Am Health Policy; 1992; 2(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 10116482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Restricted abortion funding approved.
    Stoltz MK
    Health Care Week; 1978 Oct; 2(16):1, 12. PubMed ID: 10324744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sterilizations and abortions--federal financial participation: final rules.
    Fed Regist; 1978 Nov; 43(217):52145-75. PubMed ID: 10297259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. U.S.: Obama lifts ban on funding for international groups performing or counselling abortions.
    HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev; 2009 May; 14(1):33, 35. PubMed ID: 19610210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The economics of abortion access in the US: restrictions on government funding for abortion is the post-Roe battleground.
    Fried MG
    Conscience; 2005-2006; 26(4):11-5. PubMed ID: 16619422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision.
    Kendall CC
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Office of Human Development Services--service programs for families and children, individuals and families, and aged, blind, or disabled persons; federal financial participation in state claims for abortions.
    Fed Regist; 1979 Oct; 44(209):61599-600. PubMed ID: 10244085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Why the unconstitutional conditions doctrine is an anachronism (with particular reference to religion, speech, and abortion).
    Sunstein CR
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Jul; 70(4):593-621. PubMed ID: 15739275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Restricting doctor--patient conversations in federally funded clinics.
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Aug; 325(5):362-4. PubMed ID: 2057044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The terrorists here at home.
    Quindlen A
    Newsweek; 2001 Dec; 138(25):78. PubMed ID: 11778369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. State vs. feds. Missouri becomes battleground over funding for family-planning programs.
    Galloro V
    Mod Healthc; 2001 Jul; 31(31):20-1. PubMed ID: 11508138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Grant recipients' rights in question.
    Willson PD
    Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 12266274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Compliance with new ban means no mention of abortion.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jul; 12(7):101-2. PubMed ID: 12284062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Abortion providers bounce back.
    Carney EN
    Natl J (Wash); 1996 Jul; 28(29-30):1584-6. PubMed ID: 10159048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.