These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10111972)

  • 1. Adding a competitive dimension to importance-performance analysis: an application to traditional health care systems.
    Dolinsky AL; Caputo RK
    Health Mark Q; 1991; 8(3-4):61-79. PubMed ID: 10111972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Considering the competition in strategy development: an extension of importance-performance analysis.
    Dolinsky AL
    J Health Care Mark; 1991 Mar; 11(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 10110079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determinants of health care satisfaction: a national study of HMO and fee-for-service consumers.
    Dolinsky AL; Caputo RK
    Health Mark Q; 1990; 8(1-2):31-43. PubMed ID: 10107982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding and assessing service quality in health maintenance organizations.
    Higgins LF; Ferguson JM; Winston WJ
    Health Mark Q; 1991; 9(1-2):5-21. PubMed ID: 10116306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of health care attributes and demographic characteristics in the determination of health care satisfaction.
    Dolinsky AL; Caputo RK
    J Health Care Mark; 1990 Dec; 10(4):31-9. PubMed ID: 10108699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Competing on quality. Market competition will ultimately be determined by performance, not price.
    Coile RC
    Healthc Strateg; 1998 Mar; 2(3):10-2. PubMed ID: 10346000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Switching HMO providers. Dissatisfaction with emergency access cited as the primary reason for disenrollment.
    Ho FN; O'Donnell KA; Chen YJ
    Mark Health Serv; 1998; 18(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 10179391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Issues in the consumer choice of health care coverage plans.
    Thompson AM; Kaminski PF
    Health Mark Q; 1993; 10(3-4):163-78. PubMed ID: 10127918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intentions to join HMOs: perceived relative performance versus satisfaction/dissatisfaction.
    Dolinsky AL; Caputo RK
    J Hosp Mark; 1990; 4(2):135-48. PubMed ID: 10109097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Becoming customer-driven in a "report card" marketplace.
    Coile RC; Menkin HL
    Russ Coiles Health Trends; 1998 Dec; 11(2):1, 4-9. PubMed ID: 10345224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of practitioner compensation on HMO consumer satisfaction.
    Scoggins JF
    Manag Care; 2002 Apr; 11(4):49-52. PubMed ID: 11980228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interim findings from the Medicaid competition demonstrations.
    Freund DA; Hurley RE; Paul J; Grubb C; Rossiter LF; Adamache KW
    Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1989; 10():153-81. PubMed ID: 10304285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On "some pitfalls in creating competition between HMOs and fee-for-service delivery".
    Appel GL; Aquilina D
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1983; 8(1):199-200. PubMed ID: 6863871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Market-level health maintenance organization activity and physician autonomy and satisfaction.
    Burdi MD; Baker LC
    Am J Manag Care; 1997 Sep; 3(9):1357-66. PubMed ID: 10178484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pricing and performance in health maintenance organizations: a strategic management perspective.
    Conant JS; Mokwa MP; Burnett JJ
    J Health Care Mark; 1989 Mar; 9(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 10303399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Provider satisfaction: an analysis based on expectation.
    Moore MT
    Physician Exec; 1993; 19(4):47-50. PubMed ID: 10127414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contrasts in HMO and fee-for-service performance.
    Gaus CR; Cooper S; Hirschman CG
    Soc Secur Bull; 1976 May; 39(5):3-14. PubMed ID: 799362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in the structure of CAHPS measures among the medicare fee-for-service, medicare managed care, and privately insured populations.
    Bender RH; Garfinkel SA
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Jul; 36(3):489-508. PubMed ID: 11482586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prepaid vs. fee-for-service study reveals consumers' attitudes.
    Davies AR; Ware JE; Brook RH; Peterson JR; Newhouse JP
    Mich Hosp; 1987 Feb; 23(2):6-10. PubMed ID: 10280468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Smart negotiating prevents disenrollment nightmares.
    Public Sect Contract Rep; 1997 Aug; 3(8):113-7. PubMed ID: 10174876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.