These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10113080)
21. Need for clear and convincing evidence of a patient's wishes before artificial nutrition and hydration may be withdrawn. Brushwood DB Am J Hosp Pharm; 1990 Dec; 47(12):2720-2. PubMed ID: 2278289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Perspectives. Living will concept boosted by Cruzan ruling. Olson EG Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1990 Jul; 44(28):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10105409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Beyond Cruzan: making life support decisions. Anderson KM; Byrne FD; Robinson RD Indiana Med; 1990 Nov; 83(11):838-41. PubMed ID: 2262678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Cruzan v Missouri: will the real meaning please stand up? Barton HM Tex Med; 1990 Nov; 86(11):18-9. PubMed ID: 2126896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Developments in foregoing life-sustaining treatment. Scofield GR Healthspan; 1989 Mar; 6(3):3-7. PubMed ID: 10292566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health. Barton RS Issues Law Med; 1991; 6(4):409-13. PubMed ID: 1903782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Life and death after Cruzan: recent developments in right to die cases. Elliott SJ Healthspan; 1992; 9(7):12-6. PubMed ID: 10121439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A limited right to die. Friedrich O Time; 1990 Jul; 136(2):59. PubMed ID: 10105428 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Bioethicists' statement on the U.S. Supreme Court's Cruzan decision. Annas GJ; Arnold B; Aroskar M; Battin P; Bartels D; Beauchamp T; Brock D; Buchanan A; Caplan A; Cohen C N Engl J Med; 1990 Sep; 323(10):686-7. PubMed ID: 2385279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. In the Supreme Court of the United States. No. 88-1503. Nancy Beth Cruzan, by her parents and co-guardians, Lester L. Cruzan, et ux., petitioners, v. Director, Missouri Department Health, et al. Issues Law Med; 1990; 5(4):453-78. PubMed ID: 2108100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Whose right to die? The Supreme Court will wrestle with the ultimate question. Sanders AL Time; 1989 Dec; 134(24):80. PubMed ID: 10296083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. But, why do we shoot horses?: an analysis of the right to die and euthanasia. Davidson SI N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1994; 12(1):115-61. PubMed ID: 16086499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The withdrawal or refusal of food and hydration as age discrimination: some possibilities. Uddo BJ Issues Law Med; 1986 Jul; 2(1):39-59. PubMed ID: 2427474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail. McLean ED Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Perspectives. Life and death after Cruzan. Bredder R Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1991 Jan; 45(2):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10108339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Past and present. Closing the circle on the right to die. Linenthal AJ Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1993; 56(1):46. PubMed ID: 8434045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Changing the rules on dying. Gest T US News World Rep; 1990 Jul; 109(2):22, 24. PubMed ID: 10105550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The state's interest in the preservation of life: from Quinlan to Cruzan. Peters PG Ohio State Law J; 1989; 50(4):891-977. PubMed ID: 16044607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Neurologic syndromes and prolonged survival: when can artificial nutrition and hydration be forgone? Cranford RE Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):13-22. PubMed ID: 1910128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]