These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Utilization and peer review. Medicine's privilege and responsibility. Schaffarzick RW; Parke HJ Calif Med; 1970 Aug; 113(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 5527892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Review firms under review. Kenkel PJ Mod Healthc; 1990 Sep; 20(36):98. PubMed ID: 10106189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Reducing the legal risks of PPOs. Vienna AM Personnel; 1986 Mar; 63(3):50-5. PubMed ID: 10276470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Managed-care entities could be held liable for UR decisions. Hinden RA Contract Healthc; 1988 Sep; ():26-7. PubMed ID: 10290607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Managing the claims denial appeals process. Lewis AB; Delaney A J Health Care Benefits; 1994; 3(3):27-31. PubMed ID: 10131213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Managing the medical record on a concurrent basis: facts and possibilities. Part 2. Berger E; Foster P; Laskowski L; Lu G; Oren D; Pardo D J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 Jun; 59(6):25-37. PubMed ID: 10312524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Information technology enters the doctor's office: Part I--Six design and implementation lessons. Frankel P; Chernow R; Rosenberg W Physician Exec; 1993; 19(5):46-50. PubMed ID: 10130950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ambulatory software improves QA, UR and claims processing. Johnson J Contract Healthc; 1988 Oct; ():26-7. PubMed ID: 10291185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Business applications for UR programs. Girten J J Qual Assur; 1987; 9(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 10291858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The effects of sponsorship on PPO performance. Loveland DV; Carr P Health Cost Manage; 1988; 5(4):15-22. PubMed ID: 10288559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Information technology enters the doctor's office: Part II--Six lessons about intended ... and unintended ... results. Frankel P; Chernow R; Rosenberg W Physician Exec; 1994 Feb; 20(2):25-30. PubMed ID: 10132134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. UR: from cost cutting to managing care. Bus Health; 1993 Sep; 11(10):41-4. PubMed ID: 10128300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Maine's physicians look to the 1970's. An analysis of physician attitudes regarding prepaid group practice, utilization and peer review, and the performance of Maine's health care system. Merrill MJ; Finnegan FT J Maine Med Assoc; 1971 Apr; 62(4):74-7. PubMed ID: 5574148 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Straight talk: new approaches in healthcare. Are you in denial over your denials? Enhance your revenues with denial management. Harris D; Cibenko A; Johnston S; Kline LJ; Silveria R Mod Healthc; 2002 Nov; 32(47):31-4. PubMed ID: 12510566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Substitution of hospital staff in concurrent utilization review. Darmody J; Pawlak R; Hook M; Semeniuk Y; Westphal J; Murray ME; Henriques J J Nurs Care Qual; 2007; 22(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 17563593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Responses of hospital utilization review staff to reimbursement denials. Westphal J; Semeniuk Y; Darmody J; Pawlak R; Hook M; Murray ME Manag Care Interface; 2005 Dec; 18(12):24-8. PubMed ID: 16405222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]