These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10113125)
1. Advantages of local UR (utilization review). Amos WL Physician Exec; 1990; 16(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 10113125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A national perspective on UR (utilization review). Korn AM Physician Exec; 1990; 16(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 10113119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What is private utilization review? Pavuk A Trustee; 1990 Mar; 43(3):11. PubMed ID: 10104181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Marketing utilization review services. DeMarco WJ; Fox BB Health Care Strateg Manage; 1989 Apr; 7(4):13-5. PubMed ID: 10292792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using an appeals panel to mediate mental health care UR disputes. Lazarus A Med Interface; 1994 Aug; 7(8):56-8, 76. PubMed ID: 10136817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. UR only as good as what you save. Grobman M Bus Health; 1991 Jul; 9(7):20-2, 24, 26-30. PubMed ID: 10112452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Hospitals as third-party administrators. Mindrup RW; Demarco WJ Health Care Strateg Manage; 1989 Aug; 7(8):13-5. PubMed ID: 10294316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Managing provider networks through expert systems: use of patterns of treatment to address overutilization. Miller LG Physician Exec; 1994 May; 20(5):44-5. PubMed ID: 10134064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Managing the claims denial appeals process. Lewis AB; Delaney A J Health Care Benefits; 1994; 3(3):27-31. PubMed ID: 10131213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Second opinions on coverage. Benko LB Mod Healthc; 2000 Apr; 30(16):66, 68-72, 74-6. PubMed ID: 11066779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Managed-care entities could be held liable for UR decisions. Hinden RA Contract Healthc; 1988 Sep; ():26-7. PubMed ID: 10290607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Voluntary external review part of rebuilding MCO image. Galdabini G Exec Solut Healthc Manag; 1999 May; 2(5):7-9. PubMed ID: 10537503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Leading UR firm seeks new challenge with major PPO acquisition--HealthCare Compare. Feldman A Contract Healthc; 1988 Jul; ():6-8. PubMed ID: 10290637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. NAQAP (National Association of Quality Assurance Professionals) introduces new task force: external review organizations. Boyd KV; Munsell JM J Qual Assur; 1990; 12(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 10104856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Health insurance and outcomes: comprehensive assessment of health system outputs. Perkins NA Benefits Q; 1991; 7(4):35-41. PubMed ID: 10116955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of care new focus for precert programs. Weisman E Hospitals; 1990 Apr; 64(7):51-2. PubMed ID: 2312097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Potential liability in utilization review. King MM Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 10285831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Information technology enters the doctor's office: Part II--Six lessons about intended ... and unintended ... results. Frankel P; Chernow R; Rosenberg W Physician Exec; 1994 Feb; 20(2):25-30. PubMed ID: 10132134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]