146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10113290)
1. The effect of prospective payment under DRGs on the market value of hospitals.
Folland S; Kleiman R
Q Rev Econ Bus; 1990; 30(2):50-68. PubMed ID: 10113290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2006 Aug; 71(160):47869-8351. PubMed ID: 16921666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Structure and performance of different DRG classification systems for neonatal medicine.
Muldoon JH
Pediatrics; 1999 Jan; 103(1 Suppl E):302-18. PubMed ID: 9917473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DRGs: the counterrevolution in financing health care.
Dolenc DA; Dougherty CJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Jun; 15(3):19-29. PubMed ID: 3926717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medicare payment system for hospital inpatients: diagnosis-related groups.
Baker JJ
J Health Care Finance; 2002; 28(3):1-13. PubMed ID: 12079147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the effects of the Medicare Prospective Payment System on the demand for VA inpatient services: an examination of transfers and discharges of problem patients.
Hurley J; Linz D; Swint E
Health Serv Res; 1990 Apr; 25(1 Pt 2):239-55. PubMed ID: 2109742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2006 rates. Final rule.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2005 Aug; 70(155):47277-707. PubMed ID: 16097095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of the Medicare prospective payment system on the adoption of new technology. The case of cochlear implants.
Kane NM; Manoukian PD
N Engl J Med; 1989 Nov; 321(20):1378-83. PubMed ID: 2509911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment system for acute care hospitals and fiscal year 2010 rates; and changes to the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and rate years 2010 and 2009 rates. Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2009 Aug; 74(165):43753-4236. PubMed ID: 19827228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medicare program: changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2009 rates; payments for graduate medical education in certain emergency situations; changes to disclosure of physician ownership in hospitals and physician self-referral rules; updates to the long-term care prospective payment system; updates to certain IPPS-excluded hospitals; and collection of information regarding financial relationships between hospitals. Final rules.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2008 Aug; 73(161):48433-9084. PubMed ID: 18956499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Medicare program; prospective payment system and consolidated billing for skilled nursing facilities for FY 2006. Final rule.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2005 Aug; 70(149):45025-127. PubMed ID: 16082772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. HCFA to add measure of severity to DRGs. Part I.
Health Syst Rev; 1994; 27(3):29-33. PubMed ID: 10134511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An appraisal of organizational response to fiscally constraining regulation: the case of hospitals and DRGs.
Gay EG; Kronenfeld JJ; Baker SL; Amidon RL
J Health Soc Behav; 1989 Mar; 30(1):41-55. PubMed ID: 2656845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DRG winners and losers affect profits under prospective payment.
Mendenhall S
Healthc Financ Manage; 1985 Jul; 39(7):62-8. PubMed ID: 10311154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring the effect of illness severity on revenue under DRGs.
Brewster AC; Bradbury RC; Jacobs CM
Healthc Financ Manage; 1985 Jul; 39(7):52-3, 56-60. PubMed ID: 10311153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective payment to encourage system wide quality improvement.
McNair P; Borovnicar D; Jackson T; Gillett S
Med Care; 2009 Mar; 47(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 19194336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A case study involving prospective payment legislation, DRGs, and certified registered nurse anesthetists.
Garde JF
Nurs Clin North Am; 1988 Sep; 23(3):521-30. PubMed ID: 3138668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Medicare program; prospective payment system and consolidated billing for skilled nursing facilities for FY 2009. Final rule.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2008 Aug; 73(154):46415-62. PubMed ID: 18949883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Economic incentives and organizational realities: managing hospitals under DRGs.
Weiner SL; Maxwell JH; Sapolsky HM; Dunn DL; Hsiao WC
Milbank Q; 1987; 65(4):463-87. PubMed ID: 3132596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do diagnosis-related group-based payments incentivise hospitals to adjust output mix?
Liang LL
Health Econ; 2015 Apr; 24(4):454-69. PubMed ID: 24519749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
