152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10113384)
1. Right-to-die ruling begs the question: who will decide?
Wagner L
Mod Healthc; 1990 Oct; 20(43):34-9. PubMed ID: 10113384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The insane root takes reason prisoner.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 2497081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What does Cruzan mean to the practicing physician?
White BD; Siegler M; Singer PA; Iserson KV
Arch Intern Med; 1991 May; 151(5):925-8. PubMed ID: 2025139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Cruzan case: who has the right to decide?
Johnson SH
Health Prog; 1989 Nov; 70(9):22-5. PubMed ID: 10313361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The ethics of Cruzan. Families, not states, should make treatment termination decisions.
Brodeur D
Health Prog; 1990 Oct; 71(8):42-7. PubMed ID: 10107438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. After Cruzan. The U. S. Supreme Court's decision settles the case but raises new questions.
Johnson SH
Health Prog; 1990 Oct; 71(8):38-41, 57. PubMed ID: 10107437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nancy Cruzan in China.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):39-41. PubMed ID: 2228588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Helping people prepare. Catholic healthcare facilities can give patients advice on advance directives.
Miles J
Health Prog; 1990 Oct; 71(8):48-51, 54. PubMed ID: 10107439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cruzan: clear and convincing? How can they?
Busalacchi P
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):6-7. PubMed ID: 2228592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The constitutional dimensions of the right to refuse medically assisted nutrition and hydration: an analysis of Cruzan.
Karbal W
J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):241-8, 256. PubMed ID: 10113286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cruzan: clear and convincing? Missouri stands alone.
Colby WH
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):5-6. PubMed ID: 2121666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Between life and death lies dignity.
Gasner R
Mich Hosp; 1990 Jan; 26(1):6-11, 13-4. PubMed ID: 10113092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Tube feeding and the permanently unconscious: the Supreme Court's decision in Cruzan.
Rouse F
Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 10183493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cruzan v Missouri: will the real meaning please stand up?
Barton HM
Tex Med; 1990 Nov; 86(11):18-9. PubMed ID: 2126896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Life and death after Cruzan: recent developments in right to die cases.
Elliott SJ
Healthspan; 1992; 9(7):12-6. PubMed ID: 10121439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Perspectives. Living will concept boosted by Cruzan ruling.
Olson EG
Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1990 Jul; 44(28):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10105409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Withdrawal of nutrition and hydration from an incompetent patient: legal developments leading to Cruzan.
Garvey MA
J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):225-40, 255. PubMed ID: 10113285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The case of Ms. Nancy Cruzan and the care of the elderly.
Glover JJ
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May; 38(5):588-93. PubMed ID: 2110203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The case of Nancy Cruzan: the Supreme Court's decision.
Guarino KS; Antoine MP
Crit Care Nurse; 1991 Jan; 11(1):32, 34-6, 38-40. PubMed ID: 1899067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Family decision making on trial. Who decides for incompetent patients?
Lo B; Rouse F; Dornbrand L
N Engl J Med; 1990 Apr; 322(17):1228-32. PubMed ID: 2109196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]