These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. Beyond Cruzan: making life support decisions. Anderson KM; Byrne FD; Robinson RD Indiana Med; 1990 Nov; 83(11):838-41. PubMed ID: 2262678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. The right to die as a case study in third-order decisionmaking. Schauer F J Med Philos; 1992 Dec; 17(6):573-87. PubMed ID: 1479307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health: a clear and convincing call for comprehensive legislation to protect incompetent patients' rights. Suhr JN Am Univ Law Rev; 1991; 40(4):1477-519. PubMed ID: 11651350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Clear and convincing evidence: the case of Nancy Cruzan. McCormick RA Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):10-2. PubMed ID: 16038076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Is there a right to die? Now the Supreme Court may decide if care can be halted. Gest T; Burke S US News World Rep; 1989 Dec; 107(23):35-7. PubMed ID: 10296506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Comment: the Supreme Court faces the quest of withdrawal of hydration and nutrition: Cruzan v. Missouri Department of Health. Craig P J Health Hosp Law; 1989 Dec; 22(12):375-9. PubMed ID: 10296700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty. Bopp J; Avila D Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Terminating treatment: asking the right questions. Bayley C Hosp Prog; 1980 Sep; 61(9):50-3, 72. PubMed ID: 10248005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The Supreme Court speaks on treatment refusal: the Cruzan case. Miller RD Hosp Law Newsl; 1990 Oct; 7(12):1-5. PubMed ID: 10113332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Cruzan and beyond. Rothschild IS Trustee; 1990 Oct; 43(10):22-3. PubMed ID: 10107257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The Cruzan decision -- a surgeon's perspective. McNoble DJ Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1990; 20(4):569-610. PubMed ID: 11652628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Termination of life-sustaining medical treatment: who should exercise a patient's right to die? Denbo SM Health Care Superv; 1994 Jun; 12(4):60-72. PubMed ID: 10134143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Special report on patient care. Supreme Court upholds state court decision in Cruzan. Kadzielski MA; Neumann PG Health Care Law Newsl; 1990 Sep; 5(9):12-4. PubMed ID: 10113308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The role of families as surrogate decisionmakers after Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Rushton CH; Hogue EE J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():219-38. PubMed ID: 10111247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Terri Schiavo and the law. Marks TC Albany Law Rev; 2004; 67(3):843-7. PubMed ID: 15551518 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. The right to die versus the right to live--who decides? The long and wandering road to a legislative solution. Mazzeo KE Albany Law Rev; 2002-2003; 66(1):263-87. PubMed ID: 12484391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]