These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10113385)
1. Benefits of stereotactic aspiration cytology. Schmidt R; Morrow M; Bibbo M; Cox S Adm Radiol; 1990 Oct; 9(10):35-6, 39, 41-2. PubMed ID: 10113385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammography-guided stereotactic fine needle aspiration cytology of breast lesions. Ahmad SS; Akhtar K; Abrari A; Ritanjaya ; Ahmad I; Mansoor T Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 49(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 17001878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Large-core needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration biopsy in solid breast lesions: comparison of costs and diagnostic value. Vimpeli SM; Saarenmaa I; Huhtala H; Soimakallio S Acta Radiol; 2008 Oct; 49(8):863-9. PubMed ID: 18618302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost benefit and outcomes analysis for fine-needle aspiration. Why do we know so little? Stanley MW Clin Lab Med; 1999 Dec; 19(4):773-81, vi. PubMed ID: 10572714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effective use of breast biopsy techniques in a Veterans health care system. Hatmaker AR; Donahue RM; Tarpley JL; Pearson AS Am J Surg; 2006 Nov; 192(5):e37-41. PubMed ID: 17071179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficiency of Core Biopsy for BI-RADS-5 Breast Lesions. Wolf R; Quan G; Calhoun K; Soot L; Skokan L Breast J; 2008; 14(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 18821933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Core wash cytology of breast lesions by ultrasonographically guided core needle biopsy. Uematsu T; Kasami M Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 May; 109(2):251-3. PubMed ID: 17616804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The feasibility of breast cancer screening. Health Technol; 1987; 1(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 10311915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stereotactic breast biopsy units in the United States. Kamat MR; Finder C; Burkhart R; Fischer R; McCrohan J Adm Radiol J; 1998 Dec-1999 Jan; 18(12-1):20-3. PubMed ID: 10387538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Technology assessment: a perspective from the National Cancer Institute. Shtern F Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3 Suppl 1():S84-7. PubMed ID: 8796524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer. Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ; Plaisier ML; Fracheboud J Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 17219049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aspiration biopsy in the context of the new Medicare fiscal policy. Kaminsky DB Acta Cytol; 1984; 28(3):333-6. PubMed ID: 6428110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The muddle over screening breast Ca. Thomas P Med World News; 1988 May; 29(9):34-6, 42, 47-8. PubMed ID: 10312486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Stereotactic breast biopsy. Rush JC CA Cancer J Clin; 1994; 44(5):319-20. PubMed ID: 8076246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Aspiration biopsy for cytologic study of breast masses: an overview. Zagoren AJ; Waters DJ; Silverman D; Sonn RL J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1982 Oct; 82(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 7141902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The future of breast biopsy. Parker S; Tomaselli MB Adm Radiol J; 1996 Nov; 15(11):31-2. PubMed ID: 10164847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Should fine needle aspiration cytology in breast assessment be abandoned? Litherland JC Clin Radiol; 2002 Feb; 57(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 11977938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cytological grading of duct cell carcinoma, NOS of breast and its correlation with histological grading. Sultana T; Rahman AJ Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2006 Aug; 32(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 17663360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]