These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Nonionic agents: okay, they're safer--but how much safer and at what cost to society? Levin D Adm Radiol; 1990 Nov; 9(11):97-8. PubMed ID: 10113413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. They're measuring the quality of patient care. Powers WE Am Med News; 1979 Apr; 22(17):suppl 4-5. PubMed ID: 10308881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An institutional approach to developing guidelines for the use of low-osmolality contrast agents. Swanson DP Appl Radiol; 1988 May; 17(5):27-8. PubMed ID: 10287384 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reduced use of lower-osmolality contrast media resulting from an order form and guidelines. Swanson DP; Damiani-Hieronim DR; Baron RL Am J Hosp Pharm; 1994 Dec; 51(23):2952-5. PubMed ID: 7879806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Hospitals begin cutting non-ionic contrast agent use. Werner C Hosp Mater Manage; 1993 Oct; 18(10):1, 11-2. PubMed ID: 10129785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The contrast media controversy: implications of a landmark safety study. Katayama H Adm Radiol; 1990 Sep; 9(9):20-2. PubMed ID: 10113386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fear of a white hat. Shearer DR Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(6):14. PubMed ID: 10338847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Survey of contrast media use in southeastern U.S. hospitals. Utter DP Radiol Technol; 1997; 68(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 9170181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]