These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Nonionic agents: okay, they're safer--but how much safer and at what cost to society? Levin D Adm Radiol; 1990 Nov; 9(11):97-8. PubMed ID: 10113413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Indications for the use of low-osmolar contrast agents. Bloom DM Physician Exec; 1989; 15(4):24-5. PubMed ID: 10313370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hospitals begin cutting non-ionic contrast agent use. Werner C Hosp Mater Manage; 1993 Oct; 18(10):1, 11-2. PubMed ID: 10129785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical and economic considerations in using a new contrast medium. Fischer HW; Spataro RF; Rosenberg PM Arch Intern Med; 1986 Sep; 146(9):1717-21. PubMed ID: 3092757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The promise of low osmolar contrast media: new data in cardiac angiography. Radensky P J Cardiovasc Manag; 1993; 4(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 10126705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Noncompliance with guidelines for intravascular use of lower-osmolality contrast media. Damiani DR; Swanson DP; Hanwell LL Am J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Jun; 50(6):1204-6. PubMed ID: 8517462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines on the safe use of iodinated contrast media. Thomsen HS Eur J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 60(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 16965884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reduced use of lower-osmolality contrast media resulting from an order form and guidelines. Swanson DP; Damiani-Hieronim DR; Baron RL Am J Hosp Pharm; 1994 Dec; 51(23):2952-5. PubMed ID: 7879806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An institutional approach to developing guidelines for the use of low-osmolality contrast agents. Swanson DP Appl Radiol; 1988 May; 17(5):27-8. PubMed ID: 10287384 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A case study of the decision in Denmark to restrict use of high-osmolar contrast media in intravascular radiographic procedures. Thomsen HS; Archer JW; Schiermer L; Radensky PW Acad Radiol; 1997 Jun; 4(6):446-50. PubMed ID: 9189203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Low osmolar contrast media: a quality and cost dilemma. Ostrander JR Coll Rev; 1992; 9(2):25-39. PubMed ID: 10121945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The safety and cost-effectiveness of low osmolar contrast media. Proudfoot AD Med J Aust; 1991 Jul; 155(2):136. PubMed ID: 1906974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Low vs. high osmolar contrast media. Knudson T Dimens Health Serv; 1991 Mar; 68(2):19-20. PubMed ID: 1903113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The safety and cost-effectiveness of low osmolar contrast media. Benness GT Med J Aust; 1991 Nov; 155(9):646-8. PubMed ID: 1943970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonionic contrast agents: clinical and cost considerations. Wolf G Radiol Manage; 1986 Jul; 8(3):66-8. PubMed ID: 10311703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]