232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10113737)
1. Quality of care stressed in peer review guidelines.
Rodkey GV
QA Rev; 1990 Mar; 2(2):3. PubMed ID: 10113737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Congress moves to bolster peer review: the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986.
Iglehart JK
N Engl J Med; 1987 Apr; 316(15):960-4. PubMed ID: 3821850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. American Medical Association policy positions.
Qual Assur Util Rev; 1992; 7(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 1603861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Hospital peer review standards and due process: moving from tort doctrine toward contract principles based on clinical practice guidelines.
Van Tassel K
Seton Hall Law Rev; 2006; 36(4):1179-256. PubMed ID: 16881165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Enhanced peer review immunity. Minnesota Medical Association.
Minn Med; 1989 Oct; 72(10):593, 595-6. PubMed ID: 2796902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. AMA's continuing commitment to quality medical care.
Sammons JH
QA Rev; 1989 Aug; 1(1):1, 8. PubMed ID: 10294568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The antitrust laws and the medical peer review process.
Hammack JM
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():419-50. PubMed ID: 10126945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Providers question PROs' effectiveness. Critics contend peer review organizations are too costly and fail to improve the quality of care.
Rothschild RD
Health Prog; 1992; 73(6):28-32, 38. PubMed ID: 10119535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The importance of hospital peer review. Board of Trustees, American Medical Association.
QA Rev; 1991 Jul; 3(5):3. PubMed ID: 10114869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. AMA irons in the fire boil down to quality care.
Coury JJ
Mich Med; 1987 Mar; 86(3):123-5. PubMed ID: 3574149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Meeting the peer review challenge.
Waxman JM
Health Syst Rev; 1991; 24(5):38-40. PubMed ID: 10113815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Court cases testing scope of federal law's peer review immunity.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1992 Aug; 22(34):80. PubMed ID: 10119842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Practice guidelines as legal standards governing physician liability.
Havighurst CC
Law Contemp Probl; 1991; 54(1-2):Spring 87-117. PubMed ID: 10114977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A peer review review.
Wencel S
Wis Med J; 1989 Sep; 88(9):27-32, 35. PubMed ID: 2588651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hospital liability for defamation of character during the peer review process: sticks and stones may break my bones, but words may cost me my job.
Oliverio J
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1991 Sep; (151):7-28. PubMed ID: 10114742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. They just don't get it.
Hackney VH; Le Grand AC
Hosp Law Newsl; 1992 Dec; 10(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 10122732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Is HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986) protecting peer review from antitrust claims?
Cross LL
Healthspan; 1993 Jun; 10(6):11-3. PubMed ID: 10127301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Is peer review effective?
Handler S
Minn Med; 1982 Dec; 65(12):759-60. PubMed ID: 7177085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Strategies for eliminating unfairness in peer review.
Rozovsky FA; Rozovsky LE
Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10115449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient care evaluation.
Sanazaro PJ; Slosberg B
Hospitals; 1971 Apr; 45(7):131-4 passim. PubMed ID: 4926660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
