82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10114233)
1. Doing it with data: QI's statistical tools.
Walton M
OR Manager; 1991 Oct; 7(10):13. PubMed ID: 10114233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Acceptability of quality indicators for the management of endometrial, cervical and ovarian cancer: results of an online survey.
Luyckx A; Wyckmans L; Bonte AS; Trinh XB; van Dam PA
BMC Womens Health; 2020 Jul; 20(1):151. PubMed ID: 32703282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement tools eliminate guesswork. Quality case study. II.
Caldwell C; McEachern JE; Davis V
Healthc Forum J; 1990; 33(4):23-4, 26-7. PubMed ID: 10108878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Organizational status of quality assurance and end-user perceptions of information technology for information management.
Pendharkar PC; Rodger JA; Paper DJ; Burky LB
Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Aug; 21(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 11010368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Critical to quality in telemedicine service management: application of DFSS (Design for Six Sigma) and SERVQUAL).
Yun EK; Chun KM
Nurs Econ; 2008; 26(6):384-8. PubMed ID: 19330973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Data decisions.
QRC Advis; 1992 Aug; 8(10):1, 4-8. PubMed ID: 10120416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Using standard desk-top tools to monitor medical error rates.
Carroll CA; Cox KS; Santos SR; Simon SD
Semin Nurse Manag; 2002 Jun; 10(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 12092273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decision support systems in the QI environment.
Smith M
Healthc Inf Manage; 1992; 6(3):5-7, 14. PubMed ID: 10135259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Using belief networks to interpret qualitative data in the ICU.
Polaschek JX; Rutledge GW; Andersen SK; Fagan LM
Respir Care; 1993 Jan; 38(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 10145760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical methods and microarray data.
Klebanov L; Qiu X; Welle S; Yakovlev A
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jan; 25(1):25-6; author reply 26-7. PubMed ID: 17211383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient satisfaction: methodological issues and research findings.
Westbrook JI
Aust Health Rev; 1993; 16(1):75-88. PubMed ID: 10127675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Statistical analysis of quality assurance studies].
Läuter J
Zentralbl Chir; 2000; 125 Suppl 2():125-6. PubMed ID: 11190628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monitoring ambient air quality for health impact assessment.
WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 1999; 85():i-xvii, 1-196. PubMed ID: 10791104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Using quality improvement techniques to make informed decisions.
Descutner MM; Adams HG
Adm Radiol; 1995 Jun; 14(6):12-3, 15-6, 19-23. PubMed ID: 10155040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance measures depend on effective use of good data.
Spath P
Hosp Peer Rev; 2001 Jan; 26(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 15819164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Quality indicators in health care 1: several unanswered questions on methods].
Taube A
Lakartidningen; 1999 Jun; 96(26-27):3180-1. PubMed ID: 10423980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Total quality management and statistical quality control: practical applications to waste stream management.
Kerley FR; Nissly BE
Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1992 Nov; 14(2):40-59. PubMed ID: 10121996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developing and refining interventions in persons with health disparities: the use of qualitative description.
Sullivan-Bolyai S; Bova C; Harper D
Nurs Outlook; 2005; 53(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 15988449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using hospital surveys to enhance the quality of care.
Carey RG
DRG Monit; 1989 Nov; 7(3):1-8. PubMed ID: 10295772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Video technology. Use in nursing research.
Spiers JA; Costantino M; Faucett J
AAOHN J; 2000 Mar; 48(3):119-24. PubMed ID: 10846968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
