These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10114582)

  • 1. How to defend your hospital privileges.
    Chenen AR
    Med Econ; 1991 Nov; 68(21):71, 75-6, 78-9. PubMed ID: 10114582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: does the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine apply?
    Meghrigian AG
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 10116795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review after Patrick.
    Bierig J
    J Health Hosp Law; 1988 Jun; 21(6):135-9. PubMed ID: 10287912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strategies for eliminating unfairness in peer review.
    Rozovsky FA; Rozovsky LE
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10115449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review/hospital privileges/credentialing.
    Springer EW
    Leg Med; 1994; ():57-81. PubMed ID: 7830486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Legal immunity for medical peer-review programs. New policies explored.
    Curran WJ
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Jan; 320(4):233-5. PubMed ID: 2783210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical staff peer review and federal antitrust scrutiny.
    LaCava FW
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1985 Aug; 70(8):40-1. PubMed ID: 10272117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health Care Quality Improvement Act and NPDB: where are we now?
    Brennan ED
    QRC Advis; 1999 Nov; 16(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10622805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review: current law and policy problems.
    Hyman DA
    Healthspan; 1991; 8(7):3-10. PubMed ID: 10114029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Your surprising ally in a privileges fight.
    Sgarlato RJ
    Med Econ; 1985 Jun; 62(12):100-4. PubMed ID: 10271575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review in the wake of Patrick.
    McCormick B
    Trustee; 1988 Jul; 41(7):17. PubMed ID: 10288090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antitrust law and the medical staff.
    Holthaus D
    Trustee; 1988 Jul; 41(7):23. PubMed ID: 10288093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. If you should lose a peer review suit.
    Holoweiko M
    Med Econ; 1988 Dec; 65(24):140-4, 147-8, 150-1 passim. PubMed ID: 10290905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medical peer review under legal knife.
    Kosterlitz J
    Natl J (Wash); 1988 Mar; 20(13):820. PubMed ID: 10286588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High mortality rate alone not evidence of substandard performance.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1988 Dec; 6(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 10291410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review immunity after Patrick v. Burget.
    Kelly JP
    Healthspan; 1988 Jun; 5(6):2-5. PubMed ID: 10288658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Staff privileges--$2 million antitrust judgment reversed.
    Carlson DR
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Oct; 9(21):1-4. PubMed ID: 10284024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beware hidden traps in your hospital's bylaws.
    Walker LM
    Med Econ; 1993 Apr; 70(8):34-7, 41-5. PubMed ID: 10125398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Supreme Court decides Patrick; peer review alive and well despite ruling.
    Christensen JD
    Health Law Vigil; 1988 Jun; 11(13):1-5. PubMed ID: 10287418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What the crackdown on hospital privileges means to you.
    Horsley JE
    Med Econ; 1979 Aug; 56(17):93, 96-8. PubMed ID: 10243250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.