These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10114742)
21. Will my resignation from the medical staff save me from a data bank report? Schulte DJ Mich Med; 2009; 108(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 19489350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Court orders removal of report from National Practitioner Data Bank. Simpkins v. Shalala. Hosp Law Newsl; 1999 Mar; 16(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 10346624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Professional peer review. Precautions for physicians. Struthers MS; Snelson EA Minn Med; 1991 Aug; 74(8):27-30. PubMed ID: 1921931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 (HCQIA). Wecht CH Leg Med; 1991; ():269-85. PubMed ID: 1821897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Austin v. McNamara: antitrust immunity for peer review under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Herzog JP; Fisher DR Med Staff Couns; 1993; 7(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 10183844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Two years and running. The National Practitioner Data Bank begins to roll, but issues remain. Sandrick K Hospitals; 1993 Feb; 67(3):44-5. PubMed ID: 8425740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Ninth Circuit clarifies immunity requirements and puts more teeth into the Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Fogel PD; Phillips EJ J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):337-40, 352. PubMed ID: 10138599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. To review or not to review: antitrust liabilities and peer review protections. Acevedo LJ J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):321-36, 351-2. PubMed ID: 10138598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Hospital peer review standards and due process: moving from tort doctrine toward contract principles based on clinical practice guidelines. Van Tassel K Seton Hall Law Rev; 2006; 36(4):1179-256. PubMed ID: 16881165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. California court clarifies medical staff hearing procedures. Christensen JD Health Law Vigil; 1988 Apr; 11(9):7-8. PubMed ID: 10286816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Hospital medical staff privilege issues: "brother's keeper" revisited. Copeland WM; Brown PE Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1991 Nov; (153):7-19. PubMed ID: 10114837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986]. Cruz ML Bol Asoc Med P R; 1990 Nov; 82(11):501-4. PubMed ID: 2076141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Implementing the Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Pugsley SC J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Feb; 23(2):42-52. PubMed ID: 10106379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: a view from the Federal Trade Commission. Horoschak MJ Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):17-24. PubMed ID: 10116790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. They just don't get it. Hackney VH; Le Grand AC Hosp Law Newsl; 1992 Dec; 10(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 10122732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]