These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10114869)

  • 1. The importance of hospital peer review. Board of Trustees, American Medical Association.
    QA Rev; 1991 Jul; 3(5):3. PubMed ID: 10114869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Congress moves to bolster peer review: the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986.
    Iglehart JK
    N Engl J Med; 1987 Apr; 316(15):960-4. PubMed ID: 3821850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medical peer review under legal knife.
    Kosterlitz J
    Natl J (Wash); 1988 Mar; 20(13):820. PubMed ID: 10286588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical malpractice and quality of care.
    Waxman HA
    N Engl J Med; 1987 Apr; 316(15):943-4. PubMed ID: 3821842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. QAP: the AHA's program.
    Brown MB; Sale WB
    Hospitals; 1974 Mar; 48(5):59-62 passim. PubMed ID: 4856107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antitrust and hospital peer review.
    Blumstein JF; Sloan FA
    Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(2):7-92. PubMed ID: 10295966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of medical staff departments in peer review.
    Dimond FC
    QRC Advis; 1992 Jun; 8(8):6-8. PubMed ID: 10119299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of care stressed in peer review guidelines.
    Rodkey GV
    QA Rev; 1990 Mar; 2(2):3. PubMed ID: 10113737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Australian Council on Hospital Standards: the medical staff and today's hospital.
    Aust Fam Physician; 1980 Jul; 9(7):524-5. PubMed ID: 7417109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strategies for eliminating unfairness in peer review.
    Rozovsky FA; Rozovsky LE
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10115449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antitrust immunity in Colorado peer review actions.
    Earnest GL
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1989 Dec; 7(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 10296371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of Patrick v. Burget on peer review.
    Gainer PS; Miles JJ
    Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(4):13-21. PubMed ID: 10290181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is there a proctor in the house?
    Koska MT
    Hospitals; 1988 Jun; 62(12):65. PubMed ID: 3378774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proper procedures are key to peer review legality experts say.
    Koska MT
    Hospitals; 1988 Jun; 62(12):65. PubMed ID: 3378775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. American Medical Association policy positions.
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1992; 7(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 1603861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Helping the impaired physician.
    Ludlam JE
    Trustee; 1978 Oct; 31(10):17-9, 21-2. PubMed ID: 10238923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer review complements QI efforts.
    O'Leary DS
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1991; 11(4):2-3, 5. PubMed ID: 10120864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical staff peer review--living with the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
    Gleitz HG; Strickland NE
    Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(4):1-12. PubMed ID: 10290180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PSRO.
    Ariz Med; 1974 Jan; 31(1):36-7. PubMed ID: 4855857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Informal peer review actions: can they survive the Health Care Quality Improvement Act?
    Gleitz HG; Strickland NE
    Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(3):25-31. PubMed ID: 10293721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.