112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10114871)
1. Practice parameters: cesarean birth. Minnesota Clinical Comparison and Assessment Project.
QA Rev; 1991 Jul; 3(5):6. PubMed ID: 10114871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. C-sections rise but may not be the kindest cut.
Brink S
US News World Rep; 2000 Sep; 129(9):63. PubMed ID: 11066834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The right to choose. Cesarean sections are on the rise again. Public-health officials want to limit them, but many patients and doctors are resisting.
Springen K
Newsweek; 2000 Dec; 136(23):73-4. PubMed ID: 11126067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Outreach program slashes Florida health network's rate of cesarean sections.
Health Care Cost Reengineering Rep; 1998 Sep; 3(9):137-8. PubMed ID: 10185344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeat cesarean section and primary elective cesarean section: recently trained obstetrician-gynecologist practice patterns and opinions.
Kenton K; Brincat C; Mutone M; Brubaker L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 192(6):1872-5; discussion 1875-6. PubMed ID: 15970836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cesarean section rate levels off in 1987.
Taffel SM; Placek PJ; Moien M
Fam Plann Perspect; 1989; 21(5):227-8. PubMed ID: 2806490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. When push comes to shove: implementing VBAC practice guidelines.
Coulter CH; Lehrfeld R
Physician Exec; 1995 Jun; 21(6):30-5. PubMed ID: 10161334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Practice parameters in medicine. Subcommittee on Practice Parameters, Council on Medical Economics.
Pa Med; 1990 Oct; 93(10):32-3. PubMed ID: 2243715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. C-section rebirth. Procedure making strong comeback after a decade.
Moon S
Mod Healthc; 2002 Jul; 32(27):18. PubMed ID: 12141168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cesarean section in the primigravid.
Mesleh RA; Asiri F; Al-Naim MF
Saudi Med J; 2000 Oct; 21(10):957-9. PubMed ID: 11369962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Data benchmarks. Experts urge open discussion about cesarean section rates.
Clin Resour Manag; 2000 Sep; 1(9):141-3, 129. PubMed ID: 11186350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Practice parameters called key to effective QA programs.
Kelly JT
QA Rev; 1990 Apr; 2(3):1-3. PubMed ID: 10113741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Developing practice parameters: an interview with John McIntyre. Interview by John A. Talbott.
McIntyre J
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1990 Oct; 41(10):1103-5. PubMed ID: 2242872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical practice guideline for cesarean section due to cephalopelvic disproportion.
Chittiphavorn S; Pinjaroen S; Suwanrath C; Soonthornpun K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Jun; 89(6):735-40. PubMed ID: 16850670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Practice parameters may benefit employers.
Malamud P
Bus Health; 1992 Jun; 10(7):34-6, 38, 42-3. PubMed ID: 10119130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. U.S. C-section rate remains twice what experts advise.
Pollner F
Med World News; 1989 Feb; 30(4):45. PubMed ID: 10292038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cesarean delivery by patient choice: where do things stand?
Herbert WN
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2007 Mar; 62(3):153-4. PubMed ID: 17306040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reducing cesarean delivery rates in managed care organizations.
Mawson AR
Am J Manag Care; 2002 Aug; 8(8):730-40. PubMed ID: 12212760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Putting guidelines into practice.
Gardner E
Mod Healthc; 1992 Sep; 22(36):24-6, 28-9. PubMed ID: 10120351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Where do we go from here? Opportunities for applying health status assessment measures in clinical settings.
Bergner M; Barry MJ; Bowman MA; Doyle MA; Guess HA; Nutting PA
Med Care; 1992 May; 30(5 Suppl):MS219-30. PubMed ID: 1583934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
