These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10114913)
1. An equal protection analysis of United States reproductive health policy: gender, race, age, and class. Colker R Duke Law J; 1991 Apr; (2):324-64. PubMed ID: 10114913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. No (pregnant) woman is an island: the case for a carefully delimited use of criminal sanctions to enforce gestational responsibility. Nicholson RH Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):101-33. PubMed ID: 10121876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Liberty, utility, and justice: an ethical approach to unwanted pregnancy. Macklin R Suppl Int J Gynecol Obstet; 1989; 3():37-49. PubMed ID: 2590480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sex discrimination and insurance for contraception. Law SA Wash Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 73(2):363-402. PubMed ID: 12465638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The abortion issue in the US. Fabrizio T Nord Med; 1990; 105(3):93-4. PubMed ID: 2320407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Symposium: A Celebration of Reproductive Rights: Twenty-Five Years of Roe v. Wade. Perry T; Garcia MT; Baird B; Frietsche S Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 15871152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pro-choice: a new militancy. Davis SE Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(6):32-3. PubMed ID: 2606658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States. Weitz TA; Yanow S Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Building coalitions to support women's health and rights in the United States: South Carolina and Florida. McGovern T Reprod Health Matters; 2007 May; 15(29):119-29. PubMed ID: 17512383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Choosing substantive justice: a discussion of "choice," "rights" and the new reproductive technologies. Cherry AL Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 11(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 16281338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Commentary on the law and abortion in the Philippines. Tadiar AF Suppl Int J Gynecol Obstet; 1989; 3():89-92. PubMed ID: 2590483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Expert Group Meeting on Population and Women. Popul Bull UN; 1993; (34-35):56-78. PubMed ID: 12287716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. State v. Oakley: infringing on women's reproductive rights. Schehr AR Wis Womens Law J; 2003; 18(2):281-97. PubMed ID: 15568247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights. Reilly EA Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Substance abuse during pregnancy. Legal & health policy issues. Weiss J; Hansell MJ Nurs Health Care; 1992 Nov; 13(9):472-9. PubMed ID: 1436724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. NOW v. Scheidler: protecting women's access to reproductive health services. Clayton F; Love SN Albany Law Rev; 1999; 62(3):967-97. PubMed ID: 10558500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Court stands by abortion. Press A; Camper D Newsweek; 1983 Jun; 101(26):62-3. PubMed ID: 10260662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Employe must complain to EEOC before feds force abortion payment. Geisel J Mod Healthc; 1980 Mar; 10(3):34. PubMed ID: 10245570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Prenatal treatment and mothers' rights: the legal framework, policy considerations, and research needs in three problem areas. Taub N Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1994 Dec; 736():74-82. PubMed ID: 7710213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]