These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. State abortion statutes on the eve of the Supreme Court's decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. Terwilliger LM J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jun; 25(6):161-74. PubMed ID: 10123589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Late pregnancy interruption: how tough is the law?]. den Hartogh GA Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1996 Mar; 140(11):621-4. PubMed ID: 8649531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Primary health care. Abortion: the right choice. Dingwall R Nurs Stand; 1990 Apr 4-10; 4(28):47. PubMed ID: 2111519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Under the radar. Tumulty K; Novak V Time; 2003 Jan; 161(4):38-41. PubMed ID: 12577595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Brazilian public policies for reproductive health: family planning, abortion and prenatal care. Guilhem D; Azevedo AF Dev World Bioeth; 2007 Aug; 7(2):68-77. PubMed ID: 17614992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The argument that never ends. Simon R US News World Rep; 2003 Jan; 134(2):24. PubMed ID: 12561696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. ANA opposes Bush gag rule memo. deVries CM Am Nurse; 1992 May; 24(5):3. PubMed ID: 1595971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Moving forward on reproductive health. Rosenfield A; Charo RA; Chavkin W N Engl J Med; 2008 Oct; 359(18):1869-71. PubMed ID: 18971489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Advocacy for legal reform for safe abortion. Ashenafi M Afr J Reprod Health; 2004 Apr; 8(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 15487618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Canadian Charter as a barrier to unwanted medical treatment of pregnant women in the interests of the foetus. Jackman M Health Law Can; 1993; 14(2):49-58. PubMed ID: 10131254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Taking the sting out of reporting requirements: reproductive health clinics and the constitutional right to informational privacy. Bodger JA Duke Law J; 2006 Nov; 56(2):583-609. PubMed ID: 17302004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Choice and the post-Roe generation. Morse J Time; 2003 Jan; 161(4):40-1. PubMed ID: 12577596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Thirty-year record of law on protection of mother and child, rights of women, and peripartal-perinatal health care (author's transl)]. Rothe J Zentralbl Gynakol; 1981; 103(10):529-36. PubMed ID: 7269865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Women's rights in Stalinist Hungary: the abortion trials of 1952-53. Peto A; Kossuth E Hung Stud Rev; 2002; 29(1-2):49-76. PubMed ID: 17233136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]