These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10115255)
1. Too many cooks batter technology assessment. Wagner M Mod Healthc; 1991 Dec; 21(48):29-33, 36-8, 42. PubMed ID: 10115255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Centers tapped to evaluate technology. Moore JD Mod Healthc; 1997 Sep; 27(38):20, 22. PubMed ID: 10170392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Perspectives. Technology assessment: a stronger federal role? Kent C Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1991 Dec; 45(48):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10115038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; statement of organization, functions and delegations of authority--PHS. Fed Regist; 1990 Apr; 55(63):12286-9. PubMed ID: 10104203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Technology assessment in healthcare: a review and description of a "best practice" technology assessment process. Fernandez AM; Schrogie JJ; Wilson WW; Nash DB Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc; 1997; 2(6):240-53. PubMed ID: 9543920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Getting to 'smart' health care. Clancy CM Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(6):w589-92. PubMed ID: 17090557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modern health care depends on technology, Part 2. Cowan J; Berkowitz D Physician Exec; 1996 May; 22(5):34-7. PubMed ID: 10157864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hospital-based technology assessment programmes: two Canadian examples. Juzwishin D; Olmstead D; Menon D World Hosp Health Serv; 1996; 32(2):2-9. PubMed ID: 10165872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Technology assessment, coverage decisions, and conflict: the role of guidelines. Sheingold SH Am J Manag Care; 1998 Sep; 4 Spec No():SP117-25. PubMed ID: 10185988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perspectives. AHCPR at five years: undertaking an inventory. Kent C Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1994 Nov; 48(46):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10137317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Can a center for comparative effectiveness information succeed? Perspectives from a health care company. Buto K; Juhn P Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(6):w586-8. PubMed ID: 17090556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Developing a center for comparative effectiveness information. Wilensky GR Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(6):w572-85. PubMed ID: 17090555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Federal activities related to health and economic outcomes. Radensky P Adm Radiol; 1991 Jun; 10(6):52-5. PubMed ID: 10111476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Proposed methodology for establishing priorities for health care technology assessments--AHCPR. Fed Regist; 1994 Apr; 59(79 Pt 1):19725-6. PubMed ID: 10134535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Process for health care technology assessments and recommendations for coverage--AHCPR. Fed Regist; 1993 Dec; 58(231):63988-91. PubMed ID: 10130785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. What high tech can't accomplish: beyond the Clinton plan. Cowley G Newsweek; 1993 Oct; 122(14):60-3. PubMed ID: 10129603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A practical guide to technology assessment. Goodman CS Bus Health; 1987 Aug; 4(10):14, 16-19. PubMed ID: 10301763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Linking technology with strategic and financial plans: a case study of Franciscan Health System. Fox F; Barron E Hosp Technol Ser; 1995 Sep; 14(11):1-23. PubMed ID: 10154963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Putting research to work: reporting and enhancing the impact of health services research. Eisenberg JM Health Serv Res; 2001 Jun; 36(2):x-xvii. PubMed ID: 11409822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]