These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10115859)

  • 1. Brain death, religious freedom, and public policy: New Jersey's landmark legislative initiative.
    Olick RS
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1991 Dec; 1(4):275-92. PubMed ID: 10115859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advance directives and the pursuit of death with dignity: New Jersey's new legislation.
    Cantor NL
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1992; 44(2):335-403. PubMed ID: 11651452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Criteria for death: self-determination and public policy.
    Sass HM
    J Med Philos; 1992 Aug; 17(4):445-54. PubMed ID: 1431662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Choosing life after death: respecting religious beliefs and moral convictions in near death decisions.
    Goldberg CK
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1988; 39(4):1197-260. PubMed ID: 11653917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brain death: reconciling definitions, criteria, and tests.
    Halevy A; Brody B
    Ann Intern Med; 1993 Sep; 119(6):519-25. PubMed ID: 8357120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Morality and contemporary culture: the President's Commission and beyond.
    Callahan D
    Cardozo Law Rev; 1984; 6(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 11651804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Religious traditions and public policy.
    Bleich JD
    Assia Jew Med Ethics; 1988 May; 1(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 12083149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Quinlan case revisited.
    Frader J
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1996; 21(2):367-72. PubMed ID: 11644806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Approximating informed consent and fostering communication: the anatomy of an advance directive.
    Olick RS
    J Clin Ethics; 1991; 2(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 1773111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The living will.
    Ifrah AJ
    J Halacha Contemporary Society; 1992; No. 24():121-52. PubMed ID: 11652621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Innovative legislative initiatives: the New Jersey Declaration of Death and Advance Directives for Health Care Acts.
    Armstrong PW; Olick RS
    Seton Hall Legis J; 1992; 16(1):177-97. PubMed ID: 11653079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment: implications for policy in 1985.
    Cassel CK
    Cardozo Law Rev; 1984; 6(2):287-302. PubMed ID: 11651801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency of use of the religious exemption in New Jersey cases of determination of brain death.
    Son RG; Setta SM
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Aug; 19(1):76. PubMed ID: 30107797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reconciling reason and religion: on Dworkin and religious freedom.
    Stacy T
    George Washington Law Rev; 1994 Nov; 63(1):1-75. PubMed ID: 11660276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The free exercise clause, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and the right to active and passive euthanasia.
    Smolin DM
    Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(1):3-54. PubMed ID: 8077102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The need for uniform law on the determination of death.
    Abram MB
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1187-205. PubMed ID: 11651776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Whose right is it anyway? Individualism, community, and the right to die: a commentary on the New Jersey experience.
    Weinberg JK
    Hastings Law J; 1988 Nov; 40(1):119-67. PubMed ID: 11659106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Religious exemptions: brain death and Jewish law.
    Grodin MA
    J Church State; 1994; 36(2):357-72. PubMed ID: 11659974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brain death, death and euthanasia.
    Paris JJ
    Thought; 1982 Dec; 57(227):476-83. PubMed ID: 11649636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deadly pluralism? Why death-concept, death-definition, death-criterion and death-test pluralism should be allowed, even though it creates some problems.
    Zeiler K
    Bioethics; 2009 Oct; 23(8):450-9. PubMed ID: 18554277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.