These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The Cleveland Health Quality Choice Program: an evaluation of quality. Hammar PJ Top Health Inf Manage; 1992 Aug; 13(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 10122872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Health care quality on trial. Parker JA GHA Today; 2003 Apr; 47(4):9. PubMed ID: 12856659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Leapfrog standards haven't made much impact on hospital patient safety practices, report says. Rollins G Rep Med Guidel Outcomes Res; 2004 Mar; 15(6):1-2, 5-6. PubMed ID: 15040381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Designing the Optimal Health Assessment System: the Cleveland Quality Choice (CHQC) example. Sirio CA; Harper D Am J Med Qual; 1996; 11(1):S66-9. PubMed ID: 8763239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Innovation and compliance are not diametrically opposed. Raab GK Qual Assur; 1994 Mar; 3(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 7804614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The relationship between innovation and continuous improvement. Strickland B; Coan T Healthc Inf Manage; 1993; 7(2):22-6. PubMed ID: 10126385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Readiness of hospitals to adopt quality improvement concepts. Prevost JA QA Rev; 1991 Dec; 3(8):4. PubMed ID: 10117040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Designing health care organisations for excellence. Tabish SA; Sarma RK J Acad Hosp Adm; 1993 Jan; 5(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 10130763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A partnership takes a gamble to measure quality. Kisner K Bus Health; 1992 Mar; 10(4):20-2, 26-7. PubMed ID: 10118264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The battle for Cleveland. Integr Healthc Rep; 1994 Sep; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 10137521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Physician executives must leap with the frog. Accountability for safety and quality ultimately lie with the doctors in charge. Cors WK Physician Exec; 2001; 27(6):14-6. PubMed ID: 11769159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are improvements getting lost in committees? Hosp Peer Rev; 2006 Apr; 31(4):55-6. PubMed ID: 16617923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Health for life case study. A standard approach. Carmichael M Newsweek; 2006 Oct; 148(16):51-2. PubMed ID: 17069442 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes, benchmarking and TQM. Grayson CJ Health Syst Rev; 1993; 26(6):14-7. PubMed ID: 10130170 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]