These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10116043)

  • 1. Managing performance with peer appraisal.
    Fernsebner B
    OR Manager; 1992 Jan; 8(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 10116043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to write OR process standards. Using the Marker Model.
    OR Manager; 1987 Nov; 3(11):8-10. PubMed ID: 10284704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Planning is key to performance management. Part I.
    Fernsebner B
    OR Manager; 1991 Aug; 7(8):19-20. PubMed ID: 10113047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review promotes professional growth.
    Patterson P
    OR Manager; 1992 Feb; 8(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 10116555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Designing a performance appraisal tool. Part 5.
    Fernsebner B
    OR Manager; 1991 Dec; 7(12):14-5. PubMed ID: 10115714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review--why and how to do it.
    Jackson SA
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):60-86. PubMed ID: 2640603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluating performance to guarantee a high standard].
    Pins JA; Hardie CG
    Rev Enferm; 1987 Dec; 10(112 Suppl):4-7. PubMed ID: 3438684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Making peer review work in the emergency setting: the Johns Hopkins Hospital experience.
    Hoelz JJ; Pieterick CL
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 2640605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance appraisals in the OR: everyone's business.
    Porteous J
    Can Oper Room Nurs J; 2006 Sep; 24(3):8-10, 12, 14-5 passim. PubMed ID: 17044264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. OR RN competence holds up, but new nurses' does not.
    OR Manager; 2002 Jul; 18(7):12-3. PubMed ID: 12134455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A guide to peer appraisal.
    Walker H; Joines M
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2004 Apr; 11(1):22-4. PubMed ID: 15119087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Documentation evaluation system: streamlining quality of care and personnel evaluations.
    Nadzam DM
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Nov; 18(11):38-42. PubMed ID: 3684085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Easing the task of employee performance evaluation.
    Regier AM; Parker R; Hallas G; Daly L
    Contemp Longterm Care; 1991 Oct; 14(10):24, 76. PubMed ID: 10115172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Getting 360 degrees feedback right.
    Peiperl MA
    Harv Bus Rev; 2001 Jan; 79(1):142-7, 177. PubMed ID: 11189458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance review interviews: planning for the future.
    Umiker W
    Health Care Superv; 1992 Mar; 10(3):28-35. PubMed ID: 10117109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incorporating peer review in performance appraisal.
    Cannon SC; Heacock DM
    Nurs Manage; 1991 May; 22(5):88, 90. PubMed ID: 2027641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Another look at performance appraisals.
    Hosp Food Nutr Focus; 1992 Dec; 9(4):3-5. PubMed ID: 10122699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Star performer?
    Carrington AC
    Br J Theatre Nurs; 1994 Jun; 4(3):17-19. PubMed ID: 7633053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Turn a problem employee into a valuable staffer.
    Azevedo D
    Med Econ; 1996 Oct; 73(20):161-2, 164-5. PubMed ID: 10162461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review for nurse managers.
    Waldo JM; Hofschulte LE; Magno LT; Colleran MA
    Nurs Manage; 1993 Sep; 24(9):58-9. PubMed ID: 8367120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.