256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10116141)
1. Remanufactured equipment 'as good as new'.
Health Facil Manage; 1992 Feb; 5(2):58, 60. PubMed ID: 10116141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Hospitals cutting expenses with remanufactured radiology equipment.
Werner C
Hosp Mater Manage; 1993 Feb; 18(2):11. PubMed ID: 10123847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiology. Imaging shifts.
Souhrada L
Hospitals; 1989 Sep; 63(18):62, 64. PubMed ID: 2767656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Buyer's guide to preowned imaging equipment.
Dole DW
Radiol Manage; 1994; 16(2):43-7. PubMed ID: 10134491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shared-risk service options.
Larson S
Radiol Manage; 1999; 21(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 10558028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Larger hospitals turn to refurbished equipment.
Freiherr G
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1993 Oct; 15(10):69, 72, 75-6. PubMed ID: 10146419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical imaging meets the proforma. A financial exercise for imaging directors.
Yoder E
Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(2):52-6. PubMed ID: 15098905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of business cycles on imaging services and technology.
Papatheofanis FJ
Adm Radiol J; 1998 Apr; 17(4):28-9. PubMed ID: 10181528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Asset management. An approach to equipment acquisition.
Jackson JD
Adm Radiol; 1989 Jan; 8(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 10291991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Multipurpose rooms expand imaging options.
Freiherr G
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1996 Nov; Suppl():IR6-8. PubMed ID: 10177656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Bells and whistles of technology are being replaced more slowly.
Scott L
Mod Healthc; 1995 Nov; 25(48):52, 54. PubMed ID: 10152690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Justifying capital equipment in the 1990s.
Schwartz HW
Radiol Manage; 1990; 12(2):35-9. PubMed ID: 10105542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Successful purchasing strategies involve radiology administrators, materiel managers and suppliers.
Hanwell LL; Haythorn RJ
Radiol Manage; 1993; 15(2):31-4. PubMed ID: 10126668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Team approach wins in acquisition process.
Adolfi H; Gordon GJ; Miller L; Thrall JH
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1993 Oct; 15(10):60, 65, 67. PubMed ID: 10146418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Staying even with the board. Impact of new regulations on operational well being.
Hoppszallern S; Hughes CM
Adm Radiol; 1988 Nov; 7(11):30-2. PubMed ID: 10303060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Make sure your imaging equipment goes the distance.
Halverson KA
J Healthc Resour Manag; 1997 Nov; 15(9):12-5. PubMed ID: 10176839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Purchasing medical imaging equipment.
Gray JE; Morin RL
Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 2494684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of managed care on diagnostic imaging.
Johnson KC; Thrall JH
Hosp Technol Ser; 1993 Dec; 12(16):1-16. PubMed ID: 10130238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Republic strategy calls for physicians to foot the bill for equipment they want.
Wagner M
Mod Healthc; 1990 Aug; 20(34):40. PubMed ID: 10105825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Imaging, cardiology to see some price declines.
Hosp Mater Manage; 2004 Aug; 29(8):14. PubMed ID: 15376612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
