These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10116555)

  • 1. Peer review promotes professional growth.
    Patterson P
    OR Manager; 1992 Feb; 8(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 10116555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Managing performance with peer appraisal.
    Fernsebner B
    OR Manager; 1992 Jan; 8(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 10116043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer participation in hospital department review.
    Peters DS
    Hosp Adm (Chic); 1975; 20(2):8-15. PubMed ID: 10294905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation.
    Himmelsbach CK; Sliwinski AJ; Lorber M; Mossman KL
    Man Med; 1978; 3(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 10316736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nurse teams given authority to manage unit.
    Schwanitz L
    OR Manager; 1993 Jun; 9(6):22-3. PubMed ID: 10126327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are we overwhelming physicians with medical record review?
    Spath PL
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1985 Feb; 56(2):25-8. PubMed ID: 10289611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exemplary professional practice through nurse peer review.
    Branowicki P; Driscoll M; Hickey P; Renaud K; Sporing E
    J Pediatr Nurs; 2011 Apr; 26(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 21419972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A process for objective review of physician performance.
    Haun JP
    Physician Exec; 1992; 18(3):51-5. PubMed ID: 10118411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The executive discharge planning review board.
    Disch Plann Update; 1992; 12(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 10118292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Documentation of the nursing process in the operating room.
    Wakefield B; Miller P; Farzad R; Bream B
    J Nurs Qual Assur; 1990 Aug; 4(4):45-54. PubMed ID: 2380326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementing the basic elements of collaborative practice.
    DeRose J
    Hosp Med Staff; 1981 Mar; 10(3):19-20, 22-5. PubMed ID: 10250210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Participative program planning: mandate for the 1980s.
    Wodinsky HB
    Dimens Health Serv; 1983 Oct; 60(10):27-8. PubMed ID: 6391984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The nursing research committee.
    Krouse HJ; Holloran SD
    J Nurs Adm; 1988 Dec; 18(12):37-40. PubMed ID: 3193229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation: commentary.
    Rosensaft J
    Man Med; 1978; 3(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 10316738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Staff nurses manage their own OR education.
    Failla SD
    OR Manager; 1993 Feb; 9(2):19. PubMed ID: 10123872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strategic planning: a practical guide.
    Stacey S; Leggat S
    Health Manage Forum; 1987; 8(2):41-51. PubMed ID: 10301702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer group committee tackles physician behavior problems.
    Skillicorn SA
    Hosp Med Staff; 1981 Jul; 10(7):2-6. PubMed ID: 10252366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to make your standardization committee more effective.
    Barretti ML
    Hosp Purch Manage; 1979 Apr; 4(4):8-9, 11. PubMed ID: 10241159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An innovative approach to peer review for the advanced practice nurse--a focus on critical incidents.
    Kenny KJ; Baker L; Lanzon M; Stevens LR; Yancy M
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2008 Jul; 20(7):376-81. PubMed ID: 18638177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Better structure can improve peer review.
    Fainter J
    QA Rev; 1989 Sep; 1(2):2-3. PubMed ID: 10296757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.