These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10117570)

  • 1. Calif. jury clears Blues on UR call.
    Kenkel PJ
    Mod Healthc; 1992 Apr; 22(17):18. PubMed ID: 10117570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wilson v. Blue Cross: liability of payor to patient injured by early discharge.
    Cohen HH
    Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 10183468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Going toe-to-toe with Blue Shield--for $110,000.
    Rudolph JP
    Med Econ; 1999 Jan; 76(2):116, 118. PubMed ID: 10345657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evolution of utilization review liability.
    Reagan ME
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1992 Dec; 7(12):3-7. PubMed ID: 10123071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Liability of medical reviewers. California changes its position (maybe).
    Weissburg C
    Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1990; 23(6):40, 43. PubMed ID: 10107713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Court narrows landmark liability ruling.
    Kazon PM
    Bus Health; 1990 Dec; 8(12):58-9. PubMed ID: 10107906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A treatment denial backfires--with a bang.
    Rice B
    Med Econ; 1998 Jul; 75(14):102-4, 107-8, 111. PubMed ID: 10181851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Courts let UR firms off the nook--and leave doctors on.
    Azebedo D
    Med Econ; 1993 Jan; 70(2):30-33, 37, 40 passim. PubMed ID: 10123617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wilson v. Blue Cross: a case synopsis.
    Roman S; Jamerson R
    QRC Advis; 1991 Sep; 7(11):1-3. PubMed ID: 10183515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calif. Blue Cross fined $200K. Insurer allegedly dropped member to avoid payment.
    Benko LB
    Mod Healthc; 2006 Sep; 36(38):14. PubMed ID: 17037272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Post-payment UR yields big savings for PA Blue Shield.
    Johnsson J
    Hospitals; 1991 Jan; 65(1):47-8. PubMed ID: 1985851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calif. Blues drop maternity exclusion.
    Kertesz L
    Mod Healthc; 1996 Apr; 26(16):26. PubMed ID: 10156895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maryland Insurance Administration finds evidence of improper payer denials.
    Patient Acc; 1999 Sep; 22(9):1, 3. PubMed ID: 10621471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clarifying concurrent care.
    Olmstead DL
    Pa Med; 1992 Jul; 95(7):24-5. PubMed ID: 1408263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The UR controversy.
    Gemignani J
    Bus Health; 1999 Jul; 17(7):39-40. PubMed ID: 10539170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Downcoded, terminated, and mad as hell.
    Pennachio DL
    Med Econ; 2004 Mar; 81(6):83-4, 87. PubMed ID: 15077493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medical board's authority in question.
    Burns J
    Mod Healthc; 1994 Sep; 24(37):16. PubMed ID: 10161093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coverage, technology assessment, and the courts.
    McGivney WT
    Physician Exec; 1991; 17(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 10110136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Promises, promises.
    Conde C
    Tex Med; 2008 Apr; 104(4):18-24. PubMed ID: 18610863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Blues Association calls for HIPAA to apply to employers.
    Goedert J
    Health Data Manag; 1998 Aug; 6(8):20-1. PubMed ID: 10181944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.