202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10117911)
21. State rate-setting strategies.
Cobb CC; Murray LJ
Top Health Care Financ; 1986; 13(2):17-26. PubMed ID: 3810646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Massachusetts health care reform: a look at the issues.
Holahan J; Blumberg L
Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(6):w432-43. PubMed ID: 16973652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Are states' cost-cutting measures forcing HMOs from Medicaid?
Kantor A
Manag Care Interface; 1998 Mar; 11(3):60-3. PubMed ID: 10181537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. New Jersey's health care system reforms.
Lopes ME
Benefits Q; 1993; 9(3):26-31. PubMed ID: 10127195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. State model: New Jersey. Long-term experience with all-payer state rate setting.
Volpp KG; Siegel B
Health Aff (Millwood); 1993; 12(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 8375823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Managing Medicaid.
Kosterlitz J
Natl J (Wash); 1992 May; 24(19):1111-5. PubMed ID: 10118924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Hospital reps fear plan would create rate-setting groups.
Wagner L
Mod Healthc; 1991 Apr; 21(16):2-3. PubMed ID: 10110123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Massachusetts' "miracle" reform plan stalls.
Zicklin E
Bus Health; 1992 Sep; 10(11):50. PubMed ID: 10121173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. States lead health system reform movement. '92 state legislative survey.
Solomon CM
Health Syst Rev; 1992; 25(5):17-37. PubMed ID: 10121080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. State hospital rate-setting revisited.
Atkinson G
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund); 2009 Oct; 69():1-14. PubMed ID: 20614649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Problems prompt second thoughts about Mass. universal health plan.
Pallarito K
Mod Healthc; 1990 Sep; 20(38):34-6. PubMed ID: 10106210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Health care rate regulations: the need for a reinvigorated "takings" analysis.
Dreyer FC
J Health Hosp Law; 1993 Jun; 26(6):161-70, 192. PubMed ID: 10127078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The Massachusetts approach: a new way to restructure state health insurance markets and public programs.
Haislmaier EF; Owcharenko N
Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(6):1580-90. PubMed ID: 17102183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Community care, competition and coercion: a legal perspective on privatized mental health care.
Wisor RL
Am J Law Med; 1993; 19(1-2):145-75. PubMed ID: 8368200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Hospital payment deregulation clears Massachusetts' House.
Pallarito K
Mod Healthc; 1991 Dec; 21(48):14. PubMed ID: 10115247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Competing to death: California's high-risk system.
Socolar D; Sager A; Hiam P
J Am Health Policy; 1992; 2(2):45-50. PubMed ID: 10117912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Universal coverage: states move into the spotlight.
Kertesz L
AHIP Cover; 2004; 45(3):13, 94-5. PubMed ID: 15227904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Do we have to sacrifice access and quality to cut costs?
Bradley F
Minn Med; 2004 Oct; 87(10):35, 52. PubMed ID: 15559097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Massachusetts' universal health plan: who will pay the bill?
Polzer K
Bus Health; 1990 Apr; 8(4):48-50, 52, 54-8. PubMed ID: 10104329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Hospital cost inflation under state rate-setting programs.
Biles B; Schramm CJ; Atkinson JG
N Engl J Med; 1980 Sep; 303(12):664-8. PubMed ID: 7190645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
