These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10118826)
1. PROs make us waste time and money. Gambrell TR Med Econ; 1992 Jun; 69(12):29, 32-3, 36-7. PubMed ID: 10118826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. PROs and poor quality medical care--they can't sanction it until they define it! Chenen AR Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(2):25-33. PubMed ID: 10302314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. West Virginia Medical Institute: the Quality Improvement Organization for West Virginia. Brehm JG; Smith SM W V Med J; 2004; 100(5):178-80. PubMed ID: 15617461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Just how short can hospital stays be? Walker LM Med Econ; 1994 Sep; 71(18):38-40, 43-7. PubMed ID: 10136386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The new scope of work: what it means to PROs and providers. Siegel SH Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Aug; 40(8):64-8. PubMed ID: 10277300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medicare PROs and the assessment of quality: should physician-specific quality data be released to consumers? Baker N J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Apr; 25(4):97-109, 117. PubMed ID: 10123435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Record review redux. HCFA may ask PROs to resume medical necessity checks. Gardner J Mod Healthc; 1998 Apr; 28(14):40. PubMed ID: 10178297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Fourth PRO Scope of Work: automating the medical review process through the Uniform Clinical Data Set. Baker NA Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(3):11-9. PubMed ID: 10119374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utilization management: a bad review. Himmelstein DU; Woolhandler S Am J Med; 2004 Nov; 117(9):703-5. PubMed ID: 15501210 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Review: feedback about practice patterns for measurable improvements in quality of care--a challenge for PROs under the Health Care Quality Improvement Program. Hayes RP; Ballard DJ Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1995; 3(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 10141395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality assurance. PROs struggle to keep role in private Medicare plans. Gardner J Mod Healthc; 1997 Jun; 27(25):52. PubMed ID: 10167951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medicare reviewers lack time, training--GAO. Weissenstein E Mod Healthc; 1993 Aug; 23(34):7. PubMed ID: 10127815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Gauging the performance of utilization review. Milstein A; Oehm M; Alpert G Bus Health; 1987 Feb; 4(4):10-2. PubMed ID: 10280661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Utilization management as a cost-containment strategy. Bailit HL; Sennett C Health Care Financ Rev Annu Suppl; 1991; ():87-93. PubMed ID: 10117120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utilization review for Medicare. Is this a good use of nurses' time? Snider ME Am J Nurs; 1977 Jan; 77(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 319665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The reasonable and necessary criterion and Medicare contractor review of claims: efforts to combat fraud, waste and abuse in the Medicare program. Nicholson G; Robins L Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2000 Feb; (251):9-18. PubMed ID: 10747458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]