208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10119448)
1. Perspectives. Minnesota aims for health care utopia.
Perlstein S
Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1992 Aug; 46(32):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10119448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Minn. hospitals likely to fight proposed tax.
Greene J
Mod Healthc; 1992 Apr; 22(17):3. PubMed ID: 10117576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Health care reform in Minnesota.
Miles SH; Lurie N; Quam L; Caplan A
N Engl J Med; 1992 Oct; 327(15):1092-5. PubMed ID: 1522847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The fate of SCHIP--surrogate marker for health care ideology?
Iglehart JK
N Engl J Med; 2007 Nov; 357(21):2104-7. PubMed ID: 17947389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Do the right thing: Minnesota's HealthRight Program.
Caplan AL; Ogren PA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(5):4-5. PubMed ID: 1428837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Everyone is covered in Minn., but who gets bill still at issue.
Japsen B
Mod Healthc; 1994 May; 24(20):12. PubMed ID: 10133499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Will Minnesota's sweeping changes spread nationally?
Slomski AJ
Med Econ; 1992 Dec; 69(23):31-4, 36-7. PubMed ID: 10122763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Minnesota care: round 4.
Kiscaden S
Minn Med; 1995 Jan; 78(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 7877574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. MinnesotaCare (HealthRight). Myths and miracles.
Yawn BP; Jacott WE; Yawn RA
JAMA; 1993 Jan; 269(4):511-5. PubMed ID: 8419672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Vermont's landmark health reform law: combining organized systems of care with global budgeting.
Keller J
Manag Care Q; 1993; 1(3):75-81. PubMed ID: 10132069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A public health victory: tobacco tax included in SCHIP bill.
Greenberg L
ONS Connect; 2009 Mar; 24(3):17. PubMed ID: 19364056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Minnesota takes first steps toward universal health plan.
Perlstein S
J Am Health Policy; 1993; 3(2):63-4. PubMed ID: 10126985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Access to care--should there be winners and losers?
Gonzalez-Campoy JM
Minn Med; 2005 Apr; 88(4):15. PubMed ID: 15940886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Why SCHIP is such a good deal for children's access to care.
Feeg VD
Pediatr Nurs; 2007; 33(4):299, 312. PubMed ID: 17974075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Oregon plan: increasing access to health care.
Capuzzi C; Garland M
Nurs Outlook; 1990; 38(6):260-3, 286. PubMed ID: 2235534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Will program cuts exacerbate our problems?
Berglin L
Minn Med; 2004 Oct; 87(10):35-6. PubMed ID: 15559098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Health care taxes in Minnesota. An analysis. Minnesota Taxpayers Association.
Minn Med; 2000 Mar; 83(3):43-9. PubMed ID: 10731752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The states and health care reform.
Dukakis MS
N Engl J Med; 1992 Oct; 327(15):1090-2. PubMed ID: 1522846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Minnesota unions challenge state's tax for health reform.
Kenkel PJ
Mod Healthc; 1993 Jun; 23(26):32. PubMed ID: 10126635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. California health care in the 21st Century. A vision for reform.
Garamendi J
Health PAC Bull; 1993; 23(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 10126170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
