259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10119593)
1. X-ray technician error may be wasting film.
Wagner M
Mod Healthc; 1992 Jul; 22(30):76. PubMed ID: 10119593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Pollution abatement & cost savings. Are they possible?
Davis C
Adm Radiol; 1993 May; 12(5):61-3. PubMed ID: 10126851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Experts see declines in X-ray good outlays.
Albertson D
HPN Hosp Purch News; 1983 Jun; 7(6):1, 28-9. PubMed ID: 10324261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Picture this: radiology files can pay for themselves.
Murphy GL
Hosp Mater Manage; 1997 Apr; 22(4):20-1. PubMed ID: 10166690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reject film study. Cost and quality considerations in a radiology department.
Glaser SM; Dehn TG
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1980 Jun; 6(6):19-22. PubMed ID: 6773009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiology can save through film and scan reductions.
Brightbill T
Hosp Mater Manage; 1989 Jan; 14(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 10291416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Spotlight on silver recovery.
Poundstone W
Appl Radiol; 1982; 11(3):114-7. PubMed ID: 10255425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Quality and safety are more important than price when buying radiologic equipment].
Tidebrant G; Lukes P; Wihed A
Lakartidningen; 1992 Feb; 89(8):550-1. PubMed ID: 1740947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Look for the silver lining: making the most out of silver-recovery programs.
Karasov CG
Appl Radiol; 1981; 10(4):43-6. PubMed ID: 10254034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Film loan policies of radiology departments.
Smith BR; Conway JM
Radiol Manage; 1993; 15(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 10126671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increasing an X-ray department's operating efficiency.
Hutchinson J
N Z Health Hospital; 1991; 43(3):21. PubMed ID: 10112825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A new concept in radiology QA in a large setting.
Tomlinson D; Stapleman K
Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(2):30-7. PubMed ID: 10179190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Filmless automation: from vision to reality.
Reicher MA
Adm Radiol; 1995 Jun; 14(6):24-5, 32-5. PubMed ID: 10155041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The radiographer's role in increasing the efficiency of the diagnostic imaging department.
Racoveanu NT
Radiography; 1984; 50(592):151-8. PubMed ID: 6463221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Equipping to meet the EPA's silver recovery regulations.
Hoppszallern S
Mater Manag Health Care; 1992 Dec; 1(10):7. PubMed ID: 10125487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of an image quality assurance program.
Göthlin JH; Alders B
Eur J Radiol; 1985 Aug; 5(3):228-30. PubMed ID: 4029161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. It pays to control silver recovery.
Hanmer G
Health Care (Don Mills); 1981; 23(8-9):14-6. PubMed ID: 10252768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An audit of rejected repeated x-ray films as a quality assurance element in a radiology department.
Eze KC; Omodia N; Okegbunam B; Adewonyi T; Nzotta CC
Niger J Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 11(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 19320410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. It's better to be on the train than under it.
Tilson E; Gibson S
Radiol Technol; 1994; 66(1):72, 71. PubMed ID: 7997532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
