194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10120841)
1. Can 4GL revolutionize your lab?
Csuka JD
Healthc Inform; 1991 Sep; 8(9):44, 46, 50. PubMed ID: 10120841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Strategic planning in selection of a lab information system.
Scheele K
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1988 Jul; 20(7):91-3. PubMed ID: 10302567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. America's 10 most computer advanced laboratories.
Healthc Inform; 1996 Mar; 13(3):29-32, 36, 38. PubMed ID: 10155763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How to tell when it's time to replace your laboratory computer.
Stadler SL
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1992 Mar; 24(3):47-8, 50. PubMed ID: 10117431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Serving clients in the lab.
Ericson K; Farrell C
Healthc Inform; 1995 Aug; 12(8):72-3, 76, 78. PubMed ID: 10144355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In search of the perfect laboratory computer system.
Lau F; Woren R
Can J Med Technol; 1987 Aug; 49(3):162-72. PubMed ID: 10284795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. AP Easy: information management software for anatomic pathology.
Kisner HJ
Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1996; 10(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 10158401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Structuring your RFI and RFP for an objective LIS evaluation.
Mills BD
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1991 Oct; 23(10):71-3. PubMed ID: 10114612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Systems review. The competitive edge for labs under pressure--General Laboratory Systems, Antrim Corporation.
Healthc Inform; 1991 Sep; 8(9):70, 72. PubMed ID: 10120845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Computerization in clinical laboratories and health care facilities: making decisions in transition. Part II: Understanding user friendliness, computer assisted physician ordering, patient informational needs.
Thomas S
Can J Med Technol; 1994; 56(3):178-81. PubMed ID: 10172136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fax technology: elegant solution for lab.
Hunter L; Fox M
Comput Healthc; 1989 Sep; 10(9):48-50. PubMed ID: 10303759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Saving time with combined microcomputer applications.
Scheele K
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1988 Aug; 20(8):6970. PubMed ID: 10288725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New generation of lab systems offers more functions, connectivity.
Bunschoten B
Health Data Manag; 1996 Jul; 4(7):36-9. PubMed ID: 10158624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A QA plan to monitor charted lab results.
Comer K; Shaw L; Perrotta G
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1992 Mar; 24(3):31-3. PubMed ID: 10170953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Operational optimization through custom programming and a multi-user environment.
Hoffman EG
Can J Med Technol; 1993; 55(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 10124399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A blueprint for better service.
Allen C; Racoosin B
Comput Healthc; 1989 Sep; 10(9):41-2, 45. PubMed ID: 10303758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electronic data transfer for hospital lab outreach programs.
Carniato D
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1994 May; 26(5):37-40. PubMed ID: 10134048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Health information exchanges case history. Leveling the playing field. How one health system competes with a national reference lab for outpatient lab services revenue.
Bauer C; Bozard C
Health Manag Technol; 2009 Feb; 30(2):14-5, 30. PubMed ID: 19266862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Hospital labs & commercial labs: the lines continue to blur.
Kapoor U
Healthc Inform; 1992 Sep; 9(9):18, 20. PubMed ID: 10121056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Positioning the lab for managed care.
Roney L
Healthc Inform; 1995 Mar; 12(3):70, 72. PubMed ID: 10140939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
