These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10120845)
1. Systems review. The competitive edge for labs under pressure--General Laboratory Systems, Antrim Corporation. Healthc Inform; 1991 Sep; 8(9):70, 72. PubMed ID: 10120845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Structuring your RFI and RFP for an objective LIS evaluation. Mills BD MLO Med Lab Obs; 1991 Oct; 23(10):71-3. PubMed ID: 10114612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. How to tell when it's time to replace your laboratory computer. Stadler SL MLO Med Lab Obs; 1992 Mar; 24(3):47-8, 50. PubMed ID: 10117431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Anatomy of a laboratory systems selection. Bollig B Healthc Inform; 1991 Sep; 8(9):65, 69. PubMed ID: 10120844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sifting through the data to find the best LIS. O'Brien JA MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 Jan; 33(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 11211417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Strategic planning in selection of a lab information system. Scheele K MLO Med Lab Obs; 1988 Jul; 20(7):91-3. PubMed ID: 10302567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Laboratory information systems, Part 2. How well does LIS reach all 4 corners of the lab? Jahn M MLO Med Lab Obs; 1996 Jan; 28(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 10154376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Information technology treads subtly but powerfully through labs. Wills S MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 Sep; 33(9):44-8. PubMed ID: 11569128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Compliance for the clinical systems manager. Young C Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2002; 16(5):331-5. PubMed ID: 12298444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Point-of-care testing versus central lab costs. Baer DM MLO Med Lab Obs; 1998 Sep; 30(9):46-8, 50-2, 54-6. PubMed ID: 10186317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Saving time with combined microcomputer applications. Scheele K MLO Med Lab Obs; 1988 Aug; 20(8):6970. PubMed ID: 10288725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Acquisition of a laboratory information system. Bilger MP Healthc Comput Commun; 1987 Apr; 4(4):36-8. PubMed ID: 10281301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Database management for instrument comparisons. Sealfon MS MLO Med Lab Obs; 1988 Sep; 20(9):73-4. PubMed ID: 10288730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. New generation of lab systems offers more functions, connectivity. Bunschoten B Health Data Manag; 1996 Jul; 4(7):36-9. PubMed ID: 10158624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In search of the perfect laboratory computer system. Lau F; Woren R Can J Med Technol; 1987 Aug; 49(3):162-72. PubMed ID: 10284795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Golden labs. Laboratories look to newer systems to streamline labor-intensive tasks, reduce payrolls and speed turnaround times. Marietti C Healthc Inform; 1998 Aug; 15(8):65-6, 68-76, 80. PubMed ID: 10182499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated sample handling in a clinical laboratory. Maffetone MA; Watt SW; Whisler KE Comput Healthc; 1988 Sep; 9(9):48-50. PubMed ID: 10288856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]