These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10120864)

  • 1. Peer review complements QI efforts.
    O'Leary DS
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1991; 11(4):2-3, 5. PubMed ID: 10120864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986) protecting peer review from antitrust claims?
    Cross LL
    Healthspan; 1993 Jun; 10(6):11-3. PubMed ID: 10127301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. HCQIA's grant of immunity: panacea or Pandora's box.
    Scott C
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1992 Jan; 9(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 10116004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review: federal and state protection.
    Kennedy KE
    Minn Med; 1996 Mar; 79(3):52-4. PubMed ID: 8839070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: does the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine apply?
    Meghrigian AG
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 10116795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utilization management and quality assurance: developing legal tensions.
    Gosfield AG
    Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(2):15-23. PubMed ID: 10302313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. They just don't get it.
    Hackney VH; Le Grand AC
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1992 Dec; 10(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 10122732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The antitrust laws and the medical peer review process.
    Hammack JM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():419-50. PubMed ID: 10126945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fulfilling expectations.
    Fosburg RG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 8429644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protection of quality assurance and peer review data.
    Stevens M
    Health Law Can; 1989; 9(3):79-82. PubMed ID: 10313023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of Patrick v Burget.
    JCAH Perspect; 1986; 6(7-8):7-9. PubMed ID: 10289700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Joint Commission president outlines top strategic priorities to aid QI efforts.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2001 Jun; 26(6):73-6. PubMed ID: 11419252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Court cases testing scope of federal law's peer review immunity.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1992 Aug; 22(34):80. PubMed ID: 10119842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Navigating through JCAH's new quality assurance and medical staff standards.
    Gosfield AG
    Healthspan; 1987 Feb; 4(2):3-9. PubMed ID: 10289745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The real deal on holding successful case reviews.
    Spath P
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2007 Oct; 32(10):145-8. PubMed ID: 17957886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality assessment in the '90s: legal implications for hospitals.
    Truhe JV
    J Health Hosp Law; 1993 Jun; 26(6):171-80. PubMed ID: 10127079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physician review and quality assurance.
    Dallman JJ
    Hosp Physician; 1988 Mar; 24(3):8, 13. PubMed ID: 10289841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to keep the Joint Commission happy and plaintiff's attorneys frustrated.
    Trick OL
    Physician Exec; 1995 Dec; 21(12):25-8. PubMed ID: 10153007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The peer review privilege: a dying cause?
    McKinney P
    J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):201-11, 215. PubMed ID: 10123592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meeting the peer review challenge.
    Waxman JM
    Health Syst Rev; 1991; 24(5):38-40. PubMed ID: 10113815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.