144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10121877)
1. Are we morally obligated to make gifts of our bodies?
Murray TH
Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 10121877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Do we own our bodies?
Calabresi G
Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 10121879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Our bodies, our families. The family's role in organ donation.
Dougherty CJ
Second Opin; 1993 Oct; 19(2):59-67. PubMed ID: 10129972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fragmented bodies, legal privilege, and commodification in science and medicine.
Perry MM
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2000 Jul; (256):9-49. PubMed ID: 11066591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Gifts of the body and the needs of strangers.
Murray TH
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Apr; 17(2):30-8. PubMed ID: 3583710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An introduction to legal thought: four approaches to law and to the allocation of body parts.
Calabresi G
Stanford Law Rev; 2003 Jun; 55(6):2113-51. PubMed ID: 12908477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (2006) and constitutional civil rights in the United States.
Verheijde JL; Rady MY; McGregor JL
Crit Care Med; 2009 May; 37(5):1830; author reply 1830. PubMed ID: 19373069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Using scientific advances to conceive the "perfect" donor: the Pandora's box of creating child donors for the purpose of saving ailing family members.
Sankoorikal T
Seton Hall Law Rev; 2003; 32(3):581-615. PubMed ID: 12741414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A unified approach to organ donor recruitment, organ procurement, and distribution.
Peters DA
J Law Health; 1988-1989; 3(2):157-87. PubMed ID: 11652565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The rights of the living and the rights of the dying.
Kirby MD
Leg Med Q; 1981-1983; 5-7():192-205. PubMed ID: 10302557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Human-tissue-related inventions: ownership and intellectual property rights in international collaborative research in developing countries.
Andanda PA
J Med Ethics; 2008 Mar; 34(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 18316458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Respecting liberty and preventing harm: limits of state intervention in prenatal choice.
Mathieu D
Harv J Law Public Policy; 1985; 8(1):19-55. PubMed ID: 11655781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimentation on humans and gifts of tissue: Articles 20-23 of the Civil Code.
Owker WF
McGill Law J; 1973; 19(2):161-94. PubMed ID: 11664267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Human tissue research: who owns the results?
Wagner AB
J Pat Trademark Off Soc; 1987 Jun; 69(6):329-52. PubMed ID: 11649984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Objectivity and value superveniency in medical ethical decision-making.
Self DJ
Ethics Sci Med; 1975 Dec; 2(3-4):145-50. PubMed ID: 11662214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. 2010-2011 National Health Law Moot Court Competition.
Goodwin MB
J Leg Med; 2011 Oct; 32(4):345-64. PubMed ID: 22217132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Organ donation and procurement: what responsibilities does the hospital have?
Health Technol; 1987; 1(5):182-90. PubMed ID: 10284124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 2010-2011 National Health Law Moot Court Competition: best brief.
Ramzel R; Elmore K
J Leg Med; 2011 Oct; 32(4):365-408. PubMed ID: 22217133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Opting-in versus opting-out: an organ procurement dilemma.
Steuer JD; Bell SK
Crit Care Nurse; 1989 Sep; 9(8):46-56. PubMed ID: 2582818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Rethinking the prohibition of death row prisoners as organ donors: a possible lifeline to those on organ donor waiting lists.
Perales DJ
St Marys Law J; 2003; 34(3):687-732. PubMed ID: 15233131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
