144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10121877)
21. Utilizing the bodies of the dead.
Quay PM
St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Aug; 28(4):889-927. PubMed ID: 12186064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Conceiving to abort and donate fetal tissue: new ethical strains in the transplantation field -- a survey of existing law and a proposal for change.
Bregman JS
UCLA Law Rev; 1989; 36(6):1167-205. PubMed ID: 11659206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Some moral connections between organ procurement and organ distribution.
Childress JF
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1987; 3():85-110. PubMed ID: 10282314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Rights of the medical staff in the transfer of hospital ownership.
Chenen AR; Kalifon D
Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 10292417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Selling bone marrow--Flynn v. Holder.
Cohen IG
N Engl J Med; 2012 Jan; 366(4):296-7. PubMed ID: 22187961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Rights discourse and neonatal euthanasia.
Schneider CE
Calif Law Rev; 1988 Jan; 76(1):151-76. PubMed ID: 11659061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The control of living body materials.
Dickens BM
Univ Tor Law J; 1977; 27(2):142-98. PubMed ID: 11660914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Rethinking legislative consent law?
Goodwin M
DePaul J Health Care Law; 2002; 5(2):257-315. PubMed ID: 14696648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. My body, your body, our bodies.
Herring J; Chau PL
Med Law Rev; 2007; 15(1):34-61. PubMed ID: 17200155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. A morally questionable statement of policy.
Potts M
Pediatrics; 2010 Aug; 126(2):e491; author reply e492. PubMed ID: 20679311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Medical ethics and the civil rights movement. Why informed consent is too little, too late.
Sellers J
Second Opin; 1989 Nov; (12):46-61. PubMed ID: 10304148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fragmented bodies, ideal privilege, and commodification in science and medicine.
Perry MM
Maine Law Rev; 1999; 51(1):169-210. PubMed ID: 12741402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The constitutional implications of human cloning.
Foley EP
Ariz Law Rev; 2000; 42(3):647-730. PubMed ID: 15747441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Defining the employment rights of medical personnel within the parameters of personal conscience.
Davis BG
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1987 Oct; 9(4):7-38. PubMed ID: 10284390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Presumed consent to organ donation: a reevaluation.
Mehlman MJ
Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):31-66. PubMed ID: 10121878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The liberal neutrality of living and dying: bioethics, constitutional law, and political theory in the American right-to-die debate.
Jennings B
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1999; 16(1):97-126. PubMed ID: 10695247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The right of public access to cadaver organs.
Perry C
Soc Sci Med F; 1981 Dec; 15F(4):163-6. PubMed ID: 11649363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Tricky ethics of tissue samples.
Holden C
Science; 1998 Mar; 279(5357):1621. PubMed ID: 11645031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Restricting donative choice: fetal tissue transplantation and respect for human life.
Kinney JH
J Law Health; 1995-1996; 10(2):259-85. PubMed ID: 11657412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Medical self-defense, prohibited experimental therapies, and payment for organs.
Volokh E
Harv Law Rev; 2007 May; 120(7):1813-46. PubMed ID: 17546805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
