148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10122801)
1. Demographic risk factors derived from HMO data.
Hayes ST
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1991; 12():177-96. PubMed ID: 10122801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing health plan case mix in employed populations: ambulatory morbidity and prescribed drug models.
Hornbrook MC; Goodman MJ; Bennett MD
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1991; 12():197-232. PubMed ID: 10122803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk adjustment of employer contributions: How well will it work?
Iorio KR
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1991; 12():97-108. PubMed ID: 10122809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing health plan case mix in employed populations: self-reported health status models.
Hornbrook MC; Goodman MJ; Bennett MD; Greenlick MR
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1991; 12():233-72. PubMed ID: 10122804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Adjusting contributions to address selection bias: three models for employers.
Bowen B; Slavin E
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1991; 12():77-96. PubMed ID: 10122808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Adverse selection: case study of one company's experience.
Wims ME
Empl Benefits J; 1991 Dec; 16(4):26-30. PubMed ID: 10115971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Can risk-assessment tools be feasibly used in the health benefit marketplace?
Anderson RV
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1991; 12():3-18. PubMed ID: 10122805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Persistence of health care expense in an insured working population.
Goodman MJ; Roblin DW; Hornbrook MC; Mullooly JP
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1991; 12():149-73. PubMed ID: 10122800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Health plan case mix: definition, measurement, and use.
Hornbrook MC; Goodman MJ
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1991; 12():111-48. PubMed ID: 10122799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk selection in employer-sponsored managed care plans.
Marchetta M
Find Brief; 2005 Sep; 8(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 16145791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Some evidence refuting the HMO "favorable selection" hypothesis: the case of Kaiser Permanente.
Gordon NP; Kaplan GA
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1991; 12():19-39. PubMed ID: 10122802
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. HMO rate increases slowed last year.
Harris N
Bus Health; 1993 Feb; 11(2):44-5. PubMed ID: 10123810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Adjusting the AAPCC (adjusted average per capita cost) for selectivity and selection bias under Medicare risk contracts.
Hornbrook MC; Bennett MD; Greenlick MR
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1989; 10():111-49. PubMed ID: 10304284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Case study: the Health Insurance Plan of California.
Bertko J; Hunt S
Inquiry; 1998; 35(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 9719783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of HMOs on premiums in employment-based health plans.
Feldman R; Dowd B; Gifford G
Health Serv Res; 1993 Feb; 27(6):779-811. PubMed ID: 8428813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing relative health plan risk with the RAND-36 health survey.
Hornbrook MC; Goodman MJ
Inquiry; 1995; 32(1):56-74. PubMed ID: 7713618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does competition by health maintenance organizations affect the adoption of cost-containment measures by fee-for-service plans?
Joesch JM; Wickizer TM; Feldstein PJ
Am J Manag Care; 1998 Jun; 4(6):832-8. PubMed ID: 10181069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The response of small businesses to variation in the price of health insurance: results from a randomized controlled trial.
Kronick R; Olsen LC; Gilmer TP
Med Care Res Rev; 2008 Apr; 65(2):187-206. PubMed ID: 18227236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risky business: HMOs and managed care.
O'Connor K
Bus Health; 1991 Jun; 9(6):30, 32-4. PubMed ID: 10112097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Data watch. Keeping cost hikes at bay--for the last time?
Bus Health; 1998 Mar; 16(3):58. PubMed ID: 10177728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
