150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10123131)
1. Listening to patients: a clear sign for hospitals. Interview by Matthew D. Pavelich.
Lapointe A
Leadersh Health Serv; 1992; 1(4):10-1, 17. PubMed ID: 10123131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. 'In the name of the people'--a Faustian paradox: the betrayal by physicians, lawyers, judges, academics and ethicists of the sovereign people's ultimate civil liberty.
Vanitzian D; Kopkin AH
Univ West Los Angel Law Rev; 1997; 28():81-247. PubMed ID: 16514755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. But, why do we shoot horses?: an analysis of the right to die and euthanasia.
Davidson SI
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1994; 12(1):115-61. PubMed ID: 16086499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The case of Nancy B.: a criminal law and social policy perspective.
Sneiderman B
Health Law J; 1993; 1():25-38. PubMed ID: 10569857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Euthanasia by request--from the medical viewpoint].
Helmchen H
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1993 Jan; 87(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 8442364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [The supreme court and assisted suicide: the ultimate right?].
Angell M
Riv Inferm; 1998; 17(4):225-7. PubMed ID: 10446620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Euthanasia without request--euthanasia in impaired judgment].
Lauter H
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1993 Jan; 87(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 8442366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The legal bounds of physician conduct hastening death.
Cantor NL; Thomas GC
Buffalo Law Rev; 2000; 48(1):83-173. PubMed ID: 12715817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Aspects of the dilemma: when and how should treatment be withheld or withdrawn?
Frelick RW
Del Med J; 1989 Jun; 61(6):305-7. PubMed ID: 2753191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The aftermath of the Cruzan case in the United States.
Harvey JC
Diskussionsforum Med Ethik; 1993; (9-10):LII-LIV. PubMed ID: 8012269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Hospitals, doctors and the right to die.
Havighurst C
Health Syst Rev; 1996; 29(3):27-30. PubMed ID: 10158555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The right to choose how to die: a constitutional analysis of state laws prohibiting physician-assisted suicide.
Sloss DL
Stanford Law Rev; 1996 Apr; 48(4):937-73. PubMed ID: 10169704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The right to die.
Alschuler AW
New Law J; 1991 Nov; 141(6530):1637-8. PubMed ID: 16145808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Right to die. New law and policy issues appear while old ones remain unresolved.
Fade A
Healthspan; 1994 Feb; 11(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 10132990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Legal aspects of euthanasia].
Pauser P
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2001 Sep; 113(17-18):704-12. PubMed ID: 11603108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Voluntary euthanasia in Canada.
Downie J
Health Law Can; 1993; 14(1):13-30. PubMed ID: 10145895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Everett Magnus Oration. Euthanasia and the law: crossing the Rubicon?
Malcolm D
Aust N Z J Med; 1998 Feb; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 9544386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The right to die.
Crisostomo JP; David CH; Mesina DG; Pio de Roda AZ; Tankiang SY
Philipp Law J; 1980 Sep; 55(3rd Quarter):338-82. PubMed ID: 16047423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Damage actions for nonconsensual life-sustaining medical treatment.
Dooling RP
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1987 Nov; 9(5):7-30. PubMed ID: 10284752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Right-to-die issues in Minnesota.
Klein JE
Minn Med; 1991 Apr; 74(4):33-6. PubMed ID: 1875875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
