These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10123435)

  • 1. Medicare PROs and the assessment of quality: should physician-specific quality data be released to consumers?
    Baker N
    J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Apr; 25(4):97-109, 117. PubMed ID: 10123435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PROs and poor quality medical care--they can't sanction it until they define it!
    Chenen AR
    Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(2):25-33. PubMed ID: 10302314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. AHQA report highlights shifting role of PROs.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Dec; 25(12):170-2, 158. PubMed ID: 11188112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physician data banks: the public's right to know versus the physician's right to privacy.
    Pape JB
    Fordham Law Rev; 1997 Dec; 66(3):975-1028. PubMed ID: 10182429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality assurance. PROs struggle to keep role in private Medicare plans.
    Gardner J
    Mod Healthc; 1997 Jun; 27(25):52. PubMed ID: 10167951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Principles for the release of physician-specific health care data: balancing the interests of patients and physicians.
    Baker NA; Otten RD
    Med Staff Couns; 1993; 7(3):27-34. PubMed ID: 10126798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PROs find role beyond Medicare cop.
    Gardner J
    Mod Healthc; 1997 Jun; 27(23):38. PubMed ID: 10167932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A second opinion on PROS.
    Weissenstein E
    Mod Healthc; 1994 May; 24(19):45-6, 48, 50. PubMed ID: 10133800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review: feedback about practice patterns for measurable improvements in quality of care--a challenge for PROs under the Health Care Quality Improvement Program.
    Hayes RP; Ballard DJ
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1995; 3(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 10141395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PROs branch out. Broadening quality-assurance efforts.
    Gardner G
    Mod Healthc; 1997 Jan; 27(1):32. PubMed ID: 10163922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Legally speaking: Ready or not...time to report! The 2008 Physician Quality Reporting Initiative.
    Batcheller SH
    J Ark Med Soc; 2008 Mar; 104(9):209-10, 212. PubMed ID: 18363266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Change should aid peer review groups in disciplining physicians.
    Tokarski C
    Mod Healthc; 1990 Nov; 20(47):24. PubMed ID: 10107694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perspectives. Cops or colleagues? Fuzzy standards for judging PROs.
    Cunningham R
    Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1996 May; 50(20):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10156158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Providers question PROs' effectiveness. Critics contend peer review organizations are too costly and fail to improve the quality of care.
    Rothschild RD
    Health Prog; 1992; 73(6):28-32, 38. PubMed ID: 10119535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medicare program; acquisition, protection and disclosure of utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO) information--HCFA. Proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1984 Apr; 49(74):14977-86. PubMed ID: 10273479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How physicians can avoid problems with the PRO.
    Ponder S
    Colo Med; 1989 Dec; 86(18):387-8. PubMed ID: 2689059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medicare program; Peer Review Organizations: new PRO contracts for all states and territories and the District of Columbia--HCFA. Notice.
    Fed Regist; 1993 Mar; 58(39):12042-7. PubMed ID: 10124395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The public interest in publishing quality information.
    Millenson ML
    Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1993; 5(6):25-9. PubMed ID: 10127855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review still in game. Budget law lets PROs scrutinize private Medicare plans.
    Gardner J
    Mod Healthc; 1997 Sep; 27(35):42. PubMed ID: 10170382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Let patients judge for themselves. Appeals court case asks HHS to release Medicare data on doctors, hospitals.
    Guest J
    Mod Healthc; 2008 Oct; 38(40):24. PubMed ID: 18972710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.