These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10123555)
1. Utilization management law and policy: emerging liability trends. Gosfield AG Healthspan; 1992 Dec; 9(11):3-7. PubMed ID: 10123555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Refusing to pay for health care--Part III (of III): Avoiding third-party payer liability. Ross EJ Prog Cardiovasc Nurs; 1996; 11(3):41-5. PubMed ID: 8878300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Liability implications of utilization review as a cost containment mechanism. Schessler CE J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():379-406. PubMed ID: 10118988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Should we regulate 'utilization management?'. Field MJ; Gray BH Health Aff (Millwood); 1989; 8(4):103-12. PubMed ID: 2606431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Potential liability in utilization review: the risk grows. King ML Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(2):27-31. PubMed ID: 10110106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perspectives. Liability lawsuits: casting a wider net. Kent C Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1992 May; 46(18):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10117460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Will external review mandates revolutionize managed care? Lewis A Manag Care Interface; 2000 Oct; 13(10):64, 66. PubMed ID: 11155644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The evolution of utilization review liability. Reagan ME Health Care Law Newsl; 1992 Dec; 7(12):3-7. PubMed ID: 10123071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Who'll be liable when a patient is injured? Thomas MC Med Econ; 1991 Apr; 68(8):56-8, 60-2. PubMed ID: 10110089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reviewing the reviewers. Lazarus A Psychiatr Serv; 2001 Feb; 52(2):133. PubMed ID: 11157104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Potential liability in utilization review. King MM Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 10285831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Managed health care: great cost savings with minimal legal risks. Postol LP Empl Benefits J; 1992 Sep; 17(3):32-4, 42. PubMed ID: 10121264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trends in utilization management: legal implications for health records administration. Gosfield AG Top Health Rec Manage; 1991 Nov; 12(2):22-33. PubMed ID: 10114763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence: its meanings in health care and in law. (Summary of the 10 April 2000 IOM and AHRQ Workshop, "Evidence": its meanings and uses in law, medicine, and health care). Havighurst CC; Hutt PB; McNeil BJ; Miller W J Health Polit Policy Law; 2001 Apr; 26(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 11330078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Whodunit? Causal responsibility of utilization review for physicians' decisions, patients' outcomes. Morreim EH Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(1-2):40-56. PubMed ID: 1630141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. ERISA loophole permits utilization review firms to avoid liability for malpractice. Corcoran v. United Healthcare, Inc. Margolis RE Healthspan; 1992 Sep; 9(8):29-30. PubMed ID: 10183738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Appeals: the last word. Lewis A Med Interface; 1994 Aug; 7(8):50-5. PubMed ID: 10136816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Managed care and the provision of hospice care. Becker S; Pristave RJ Manag Care Q; 1995; 3(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 10140986 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]