These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10123589)

  • 1. State abortion statutes on the eve of the Supreme Court's decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Terwilliger LM
    J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jun; 25(6):161-74. PubMed ID: 10123589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comment: United States Supreme Court upholds right to abortion subject to increased state regulation. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Cerny RA
    J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):212-5. PubMed ID: 10183821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Supreme Court, liberty, and abortion.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Aug; 327(9):651-4. PubMed ID: 1640971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Casey and the resuscitation of Roe v. Wade.
    Robertson JA
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(5):24-8. PubMed ID: 1428831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
    Martin PA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
    Burdick R
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences.
    Koslov TI
    Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rust corrodes: the First Amendment implications of Rust v. Sullivan.
    Fitzpatrick M
    Stanford Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 45(1):185-227. PubMed ID: 10183813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Eroding access to reproductive services.
    Lado ME
    Health PAC Bull; 1992; 22(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 10183723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
    Borgmann CE
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abortion, precedent, and the Constitution: a comment on Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Maltz EM
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 68(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 11656531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abortion providers bounce back.
    Carney EN
    Natl J (Wash); 1996 Jul; 28(29-30):1584-6. PubMed ID: 10159048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Webster versus reproductive health services.
    Rhodes AM
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989; 14(6):423. PubMed ID: 2514333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The summer of our discontent.
    O'Connor J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(5):28-9. PubMed ID: 1428832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pro-choice: a new militancy.
    Davis SE
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(6):32-3. PubMed ID: 2606658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Kassop N
    PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence.
    Bigel AI
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A relational approach to moral decision-making: the majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Sullivan PA; Goldzwig SR
    Q J Speech; 1995 May; 81(2):167-90. PubMed ID: 11808622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries.
    Smolin DM
    Cumberland Law Rev; 1989-1990; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Four-one-four.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(5):27-9. PubMed ID: 2793440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.