These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10123589)

  • 21. How not to promote serious deliberation about abortion.
    McConnell MW
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1991; 58(3):1181-202. PubMed ID: 11656153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reproductive rights and the medical care system: a plea for rational health policy.
    Stephenson PA; Wagner MG
    J Public Health Policy; 1993; 14(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 8408608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Privacy II: state attempts to regulate abortion.
    Prall S
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):385-427. PubMed ID: 11652657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Abortion and its viability standard: the woman's diminishing right to choose.
    Swyers MH
    Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1997; 8(1-2):87-109. PubMed ID: 14628785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision.
    Kendall CC
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation.
    Moses MF
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The right of privacy and restraints on abortion under the "undue burden" test: a jurisprudential comparison of Planned Parenthood v. Casey with European practice and Italian law.
    Ross CS
    Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 3():199-231. PubMed ID: 12091926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Equality theory and reproductive freedom.
    Colker R
    Tex J Women Law; 1994; 3(1):99-122. PubMed ID: 12645608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
    Weitz TA; Yanow S
    Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reproductive self-determination in the Third Circuit: the statutory proscription of wrongful birth and wrongful life claims as an unconstitutional violation of Planned Parenthood v. Casey's undue burden standard.
    Intromasso C
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2003; 24(2):101-20. PubMed ID: 15568248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Supreme Court preserves right to abortion, but allows restrictions. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Swisher KN; Berriman GS
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 1992; 12(4):50-2. PubMed ID: 10183733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions.
    Appleton SF
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals.
    Benshoof J
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Planned Parenthood v Casey.
    Lasky HP
    JAMA; 1993 Dec; 270(21):2559; author reply 2559-60. PubMed ID: 8230640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perspectives. Abortion after Webster.
    Olson EG
    Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1989 Jul; 43(28):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10294036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ending the abortion war: a modest proposal.
    Kissling F
    Christ Century; 1990 Feb; 107(6):180-4. PubMed ID: 11655989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The abortion alternative and the patient's right to know.
    Shapiro SC
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1979 Dec; (10):5-48. PubMed ID: 10295000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
    Haas-Wilson D
    J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Webster, vagueness and the First Amendment.
    Bopp J; Coleson RE
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):217-22. PubMed ID: 2603865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.