133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10124087)
1. Defining death, natural death legislation and withdrawal of treatment.
Bates P
Aust Health Rev; 1992; 15(4):392-421. PubMed ID: 10124087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Natural death in 2003: are we slipping backwards?
Ashby M; Mendelson D
J Law Med; 2003 Feb; 10(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 12649994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Advanced directives, the right to die and the common law: recent problems with blood transfusions.
Stewart C
Melb Univ Law Rev; 1999 Apr; 23(1):161-83. PubMed ID: 12678066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Refusal of treatment, leading to death: towards optimization of informed consent.
Trevor-Deutsch B; Nelson RF
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1996 Dec; 29(8):487-9. PubMed ID: 12380578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Informed consent for people with diminished capacity to consent.
Whyman RA; Rose D
N Z Dent J; 2001 Dec; 97(430):137-9. PubMed ID: 11887664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. End-of-life patients, intensive care and consent: difficulties facing French intensivists.
Franchitto N; Vinour H; Gavarri L; Telmon N; Rouge D
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Aug; 24(8):709-13. PubMed ID: 17462114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Operation of guardianship laws in the emergency ward.
Mendelson D; Saunders A
J Law Med; 2011 Sep; 19(1):13-31. PubMed ID: 21988006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment of incompetent terminally ill patients. 2. Reflections on the American experience.
Thomson CJ
Med J Aust; 1982 Mar; 1(6):246-7. PubMed ID: 7087841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The California Natural Death Act: an empirical study of physicians' practices.
Redleaf DL; Schmitt SB; Thompson WC
Stanford Law Rev; 1979 May; 31(5):913-45. PubMed ID: 10243334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medicine and human rights: emerging substantive standards and procedural protections for medical decision making within the American family.
Baron CH
J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1985; 18(2):95-141. PubMed ID: 4086738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Care of the brain dead and other troubling patients.
Vates TS
Del Med J; 1988 Sep; 60(9):529-30. PubMed ID: 3181551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Consent to medical procedures and the Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988.
Grant E
Otago Law Rev; 1989; 7(1):161-78. PubMed ID: 11659272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Virginia Natural Death Act--a critical analysis.
Murphy JG
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1983; 17(4):863-79. PubMed ID: 11649800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Withholding and withdrawing treatment, ethical and legal aspects].
Pedersen R; Bahus MK; Kvisle EM
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(12):1648-50. PubMed ID: 17571104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment: national trend and recent changes in Maryland law.
Goldmeier KE
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1306-43. PubMed ID: 12599354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Therefore, choose death.
Brown ML
Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Quality management in the hospital--methodological comments on quality effects of two aspects of a real case].
Meyer M
Gesundheitswesen; 1993 Nov; 55(11):555-60. PubMed ID: 8286894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health-care decision making, Part II. Choices for incapacitated patients.
Grant K; Huntington SR
Physician Assist; 1989 Jul; 13(7):76-86. PubMed ID: 10293914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Why I wrote my advance decision to refuse life-prolonging treatment: and why the law on sanctity of life remains problematic.
Gillon R
J Med Ethics; 2016 Jun; 42(6):376-82. PubMed ID: 27118692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]