137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10124094)
1. Perspectives. States rediscover certificate-of-need laws.
Jee M
Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1993 Feb; 47(8):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10124094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Certificate-of-need laws back in style again.
Jee M
J Am Health Policy; 1993; 3(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 10126983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. States targeting CON laws, but few changes expected.
Pallarito K
Mod Healthc; 1995 May; 25(18):31. PubMed ID: 10141666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Restrictive certificate-of-need conditions: do they survive beyond repeal of the law?
Weissburg C; Stern KM
Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1987; 20(5):56-7. PubMed ID: 10284386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Judicial review of state health plans after the Health Planning and Resources Development Amendments of 1979.
Carter DL
Duke Law J; 1981 Apr; (2):404-15. PubMed ID: 10251304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Focus report. CON survival struggle. Certificate of need: gone in many states but not dead yet.
Moore JD
Mod Healthc; 1997 Aug; 27(32):32-3, 36. PubMed ID: 10169132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. States show new interest in regulated health planning.
Diller W
Bus Health; 1993 Feb; 11(2):20-4. PubMed ID: 10123807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Wis. hospitals fight proposals. Lawmakers push more restrictions on construction.
Tieman J
Mod Healthc; 2002 May; 32(21):14-5. PubMed ID: 12066392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Maine revamps funding formula.
Vesely R
Mod Healthc; 2009 Jun; 39(24):14. PubMed ID: 19554834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. State laws: a stumbling block for systems integration?
Hudson T
Hosp Health Netw; 1994 Apr; 68(8):40-5. PubMed ID: 8148885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Running interference. Justice Department looks into S.C.'s CON specifics.
Galloro V
Mod Healthc; 2006 Sep; 36(35):20. PubMed ID: 16986336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Health care and hospitals: things to come.
Weissburg C; Conn LC
Health Syst Rev; 1992; 25(4):42, 44-5. PubMed ID: 10119868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pros and CONS: is there still a need for certificate of need?
Healthc Ala; 1992; 5(3):4-8. PubMed ID: 10119321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Healthcare lobbying efforts turn to states.
Tokarski C
Mod Healthc; 1990 Jul; 20(29):29-30, 38-40, 44. PubMed ID: 10105358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Policy and practice: certified home health care in New York City.
Fox KS; Helms WD; Ginsburg S
Pap Ser United Hosp Fund N Y; 1990 Aug; (11):1-46. PubMed ID: 10126101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Certificate of Need revisited.
Mendelson DN; Arnold J
Spectrum; 1993; 66(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 10123518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Missouri governor wants to put CON decisions in different hands.
Wagner M
Mod Healthc; 1992 Feb; 22(6):30. PubMed ID: 10116208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Common sense meets implementation: certificate-of-need regulation in the states.
Brown LD
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1983; 8(3):480-94. PubMed ID: 6643983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Public Health Service--health systems agencies and state health planning and development agencies; certificate of need reviews. Notice regarding certificate of need programs.
Fed Regist; 1980 Feb; 45(37):12174-85. PubMed ID: 10245320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. State responses to federal health regulatory requirements.
Penn W; Buntz CG
J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1980 Feb; 2(3):282-98. PubMed ID: 10278019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
