These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10124311)

  • 1. The effect of per-item fees on the behaviour of general practitioners.
    Hughes D; Yule B
    J Health Econ; 1992 Dec; 11(4):413-37. PubMed ID: 10124311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative fees and the utilization of physicians' services in Canada.
    Hurley J; Labelle R
    Health Econ; 1995; 4(6):419-38. PubMed ID: 8653183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physician response to Medicare fee reductions: changes in the volume of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgeries in the Medicare and private sectors.
    Yip WC
    J Health Econ; 1998 Dec; 17(6):675-99. PubMed ID: 10339248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedback are removed? ACCEPt-able: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol.
    Hocking JS; Temple-Smith M; van Driel M; Law M; Guy R; Bulfone L; Wood A; Low N; Donovan B; Fairley CK; Kaldor J; Gunn J
    Implement Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(1):122. PubMed ID: 27624835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A problem with consumer surplus measures of the cost of practice variations.
    Dranove D
    J Health Econ; 1995 Jun; 14(2):243-51. PubMed ID: 10154660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How do doctors behave when some (but not all) of their patients are in managed care?
    Glied S; Zivin JG
    J Health Econ; 2002 Mar; 21(2):337-53. PubMed ID: 11939245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incentive payments to general practitioners aimed at increasing opportunistic testing of young women for chlamydia: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.
    Bilardi JE; Fairley CK; Temple-Smith MJ; Pirotta MV; McNamee KM; Bourke S; Gurrin LC; Hellard M; Sanci LA; Wills MJ; Walker J; Chen MY; Hocking JS
    BMC Public Health; 2010 Feb; 10():70. PubMed ID: 20158918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. GPs: working harder than ever.
    Paddison C; Abel G; Campbell J
    Br J Gen Pract; 2018 May; 68(670):218-219. PubMed ID: 29700019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New medicines in primary care: a review of influences on general practitioner prescribing.
    Mason A
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2008 Feb; 33(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18211610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Financial incentives and primary care provision in Britain: do general practitioners maximise their income?
    Lynch M
    Dev Health Econ Public Policy; 1998; 6():191-210. PubMed ID: 10662404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Profiling primary care physician resource use: examining the application of case mix adjustment.
    Tucker AM; Weiner JP; Honigfeld S; Parton RA
    J Ambul Care Manage; 1996 Jan; 19(1):60-80. PubMed ID: 10154370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do budget-holding physicians respond to price? the case of fundholding in the UK.
    Spoor C; Munro J
    Health Serv Manage Res; 2003 Nov; 16(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 14613623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. More physicians: improved availability or induced demand?
    Carlsen F; Grytten J
    Health Econ; 1998 Sep; 7(6):495-508. PubMed ID: 9809708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fixed fees and physician-induced demand: a panel data study on French physicians.
    Delattre E; Dormont B
    Health Econ; 2003 Sep; 12(9):741-54. PubMed ID: 12950093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Type of contract and supplier-induced demand for primary physicians in Norway.
    Grytten J; Sørensen R
    J Health Econ; 2001 May; 20(3):379-93. PubMed ID: 11373837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A tale of two bounties: the impact of competing fees on physician behavior.
    Rice T; Stearns SC; Pathman DE; DesHarnais S; Brasure M; Tai-Seale M
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1999 Dec; 24(6):1307-30. PubMed ID: 10626694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attitudes and behaviour of general practitioners and their prescribing costs: a national cross sectional survey.
    Watkins C; Harvey I; Carthy P; Moore L; Robinson E; Brawn R
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2003 Feb; 12(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 12571342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of direct and extra billing for medical services: evidence from a natural experiment in British Columbia.
    Epp MJ; Vining AR; Collins-Dodd C; Love E
    Soc Sci Med; 2000 Sep; 51(5):691-702. PubMed ID: 10975229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceived financial incentives, HMO market penetration, and physicians' practice styles and satisfaction.
    Hadley J; Mitchell JM; Sulmasy DP; Bloche MG
    Health Serv Res; 1999 Apr; 34(1 Pt 2):307-21. PubMed ID: 10199677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences between family physicians' and general internists' medical charges.
    Bertakis KD; Helms LJ; Azari R; Callahan EJ; Robbins JA; Miller J
    Med Care; 1999 Jan; 37(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 10413395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.