These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10124461)

  • 1. Review of methods & simulators for evaluation of noninvasive blood pressure monitors.
    Ng KG; Small CF
    J Clin Eng; 1992; 17(6):469-79. PubMed ID: 10124461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survey of automated noninvasive blood pressure monitors.
    Ng KG; Small CF
    J Clin Eng; 1994; 19(6):452-75. PubMed ID: 10139740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of three oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure simulators.
    Amoore JN; Geake WB
    J Clin Eng; 1997; 22(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 10166510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Update on methods & simulators for evaluation of noninvasive blood pressure monitors.
    Ng KG; Small CF
    J Clin Eng; 1994; 19(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 10134197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated noninvasive blood pressure measurement.
    Ng KG
    Intensive Care World; 1995 Sep; 12(3):89-102. PubMed ID: 10157893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can simulators evaluate systematic differences between oscillometric non-invasive blood-pressure monitors?
    Amoore JN; Scott DH
    Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 10828894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A procedure for evaluation of non-invasive blood pressure simulators.
    Gersak G; Zemva A; Drnovsek J
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2009 Dec; 47(12):1221-8. PubMed ID: 19823889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure monitors using the Dynatech Nevada CuffLink analyser.
    Amoore JN
    J Med Eng Technol; 1993; 17(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8326508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An automated system for the functional evaluation of oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure monitors.
    Geake WB; Amoore JN; Scott DH
    J Med Eng Technol; 1995; 19(5):162-76. PubMed ID: 8676369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of automated and semi-automated blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systems.
    O'Brien E; Petrie J; Littler W; de Swiet M; Padfield PL; O'Malley K; Jamieson M; Altman D; Bland M; Atkins N
    J Hypertens; 1990 Jul; 8(7):607-19. PubMed ID: 2168451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the A&D UA-767 and Welch Allyn Spot Vital Signs noninvasive blood pressure monitors using a blood pressure simulator.
    Davis PD; Dennis JL; Railton R
    J Hum Hypertens; 2005 Mar; 19(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 15565174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical validation protocols for noninvasive blood pressure monitors and their recognition by regulatory authorities and professional organizations: rationale and considerations for a single unified protocol or standard.
    Ng KG
    Blood Press Monit; 2013 Oct; 18(5):282-9. PubMed ID: 23709002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Arterial blood pressure measurement with oscillometric instruments in newborns and infants].
    Papadopoulos G; Oldörp B; Mieke S
    Anaesthesist; 1994 Jul; 43(7):441-6. PubMed ID: 8092453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Considerations for simulation-based evaluation of noninvasive blood pressure monitors.
    Ng KG
    Blood Press Monit; 1997 Oct; 2(5):257-268. PubMed ID: 10234127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systems.
    O'Brien E; O'Malley K
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1990 Dec; 8(7):S133-9. PubMed ID: 2095381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oscillometric blood pressure devices and simulators: measurements of repeatability and differences between models.
    Sims AJ; Reay CA; Bousfield DR; Menes JA; Murray A
    J Med Eng Technol; 2005; 29(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 16019880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of the SpaceLabs 90207 determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol.
    O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N; O'Malley K
    J Hypertens; 1991 Jun; 9(6):573-4. PubMed ID: 1653299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of the Novacor DIASYS 200 determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol.
    O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N; O'Malley K
    J Hypertens; 1991 Jun; 9(6):569-70. PubMed ID: 1653297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of the Takeda TM-2420/TM-2020 determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol.
    O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N; O'Malley K
    J Hypertens; 1991 Jun; 9(6):571-2. PubMed ID: 1653298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing the accuracy of blood pressure monitoring devices in ambulatory conditions.
    Parati G; Groppelli A; Omboni S; Trazzi S; Frattola A; Mancia G
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1991 Dec; 9(8):S7-9. PubMed ID: 1795209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.